Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Devel #70

Merged
merged 50 commits into from
Sep 21, 2024
Merged

Devel #70

merged 50 commits into from
Sep 21, 2024

Conversation

lhdjung
Copy link
Owner

@lhdjung lhdjung commented Sep 21, 2024

No description provided.

* `use_standalone("r-lib/rlang", file = "types-check")`
* With the previous commit, it is no longer needed.
* This also reverses the deprecation of `tolerance` in `grim_items()`.
* Temporary measure as a step on the way to re-implementing GRIMMER in scrutiny.
This also includes:
* Deprecating the `show_prob` argument
* Renaming two columns returned by the corresponding `audit()` method
* A little refactoring of `grim_map()`
lhdjung added 20 commits August 24, 2024 13:02
* This is purely an automatic translation of variable names.
* To wit, the idea is to incorporate a modified version of `rsprite2::GRIMMER_test()` into scrutiny. The process starts with choosing more idiomatic variable names.
* Not planning to take on the checkmate dependency -- it seems like a nice package, but with a strange license.
* In particular, `x` needs to be a string. I should manage this in a way similar to `grim_scalar()`.
* Include link to the Shiny app
* Remove less important paragraph -- too much text overall.
These objects were implemented differently from rsprite2:
* `p10`
* `sum_squares_lower`
* `sum_squares_upper`
* Fix #58
* The `items` fix was added earlier, but now I am confident in the overall implementation.
* Some questions about disagreements between the implementations remain, but they are likely about GRIM, not GRIMMER; see the new "Resolve disagreements" section in test-grimmer.R
* They led to hard bugs
* They were not really necessary
* It's never needed as a separate variable.
* Using `rhub::rhub_setup()`
@lhdjung lhdjung merged commit 096b5a7 into main Sep 21, 2024
0 of 7 checks passed
@lhdjung lhdjung deleted the devel branch September 21, 2024 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant