-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LPD-34901 #2117
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
LPD-34901 #2117
Conversation
ci:test:sf |
ci:test:relevant |
ci:test:upgrade |
ci:test:sf |
1 similar comment
ci:test:sf |
ci:test:relevant |
ci:test:upgrade |
✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 5 minutesClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Sender Branch:Branch Name: LPD-34901-rename 1 Successful Jobs:For more details click here. |
Jenkins Build:test-portal-source-format#7057 Jenkins Report:jenkins-report.html Jenkins Suite:sf Pull Request:liferay-appsec#2117 Testray Routine:EE Pull Request Testray Build:[master] ci:test:sf - liferay-appsec > liferay-appsec - PR#2117 - 2024-12-12[00:23:05] Testray Build ID:89973572 Testray Importer:publish-testray-report#26118 |
ci:test:upgrade Invoking upgrade test suite because an upgrade file has been modified. |
Jenkins Build:test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest(master)#14276 Jenkins Report:jenkins-report.html Jenkins Suite:upgrade Pull Request:liferay-appsec#2117 Testray Routine:EE Pull Request Testray Build:[master] ci:test:upgrade - liferay-appsec > liferay-appsec - PR#2117 - 2024-12-12[00:36:57] Testray Build ID:89997417 Testray Importer:publish-testray-report#33208 |
✔️ ci:test:stable - 24 out of 24 jobs passed❌ ci:test:relevant - 29 out of 32 jobs passed in 2 hours 8 minutesClick here for more details.This pull is eligible for reevaluation. When this upstream build has completed, using the following CI command will compare this pull request result against a more recent upstream result: ci:reevaluate:1307401_10617 Base Branch:Branch Name: master Upstream Comparison:Branch GIT ID: ebe8f20b5b506aa1801c5f06e86295c6ba8fd423 ci:test:stable - 24 out of 24 jobs PASSED24 Successful Jobs:ci:test:relevant - 29 out of 32 jobs PASSED3 Failed Jobs:
29 Successful Jobs:For more details click here.Failures unique to this pull:
For upstream results, click here. |
ci:upgrade |
ci:test:upgrade |
✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 6 minutesClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Sender Branch:Branch Name: LPD-34901-rename 1 Successful Jobs:For more details click here. |
Jenkins Build:test-portal-source-format#10997 Jenkins Report:jenkins-report.html Jenkins Suite:sf Pull Request:liferay-appsec#2117 Testray Routine:EE Pull Request Testray Build:[master] ci:test:sf - liferay-appsec > liferay-appsec - PR#2117 - 2024-12-17[02:42:50] Testray Build ID:93762978 Testray Importer:publish-testray-report#41663 |
Jenkins Build:test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest(master)#7048 Jenkins Report:jenkins-report.html Jenkins Suite:upgrade Pull Request:liferay-appsec#2117 Testray Routine:EE Pull Request Testray Build:[master] ci:test:upgrade - liferay-appsec > liferay-appsec - PR#2117 - 2024-12-17[02:43:20] Testray Build ID:93806032 Testray Importer:publish-testray-report#15688 |
Hey @ChrisKian, After Istvan finishes the test ci results analysis, Can you review this pr? Once you finish I can take a second look. Thanks in advance |
ci:test:relevant |
❌ ci:test:stable - 24 out of 25 jobs passed❌ ci:test:relevant - 28 out of 32 jobs passed in 1 hour 32 minutesClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Upstream Comparison:Branch GIT ID: 1d1009bc5a1f8b027c53e140f147d9a272f71af8 ci:test:stable - 24 out of 25 jobs PASSED1 Failed Jobs:
24 Successful Jobs:ci:test:relevant - 28 out of 32 jobs PASSED4 Failed Jobs:
28 Successful Jobs:For more details click here.Failures unique to this pull:
|
Jenkins Build:test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest(master)#12342 Jenkins Report:jenkins-report.html Jenkins Suite:relevant Pull Request:liferay-appsec#2117 Testray Routine:EE Pull Request Testray Build:[master] ci:test:relevant - liferay-appsec > liferay-appsec - PR#2117 - 2024-12-18[03:22:07] Testray Build ID:94889071 Testray Importer:publish-testray-report#26871 |
@rafaprax , @ChrisKian , All failures look unrelated. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good to me, and I also agree with Istvan's argument for the OAuthClientEntryUpgradeProcessTest
being in the correct location.
LPD-34901
Adding the changes requested in the 2nd and 3rd points of brianchandotcom#156729 (comment)
To the 1st point I would just add that OAuthClientEntryUpgradeProcessTest seems to be in the correct module and package, I think. The tested class OAuthClientEntryUpgradeProcess resides in oauth-client-persistence-service, for which we use oauth-client-persistence-test in genaral to store the related integration tests.
cc @stian-sigvartsen @rafaprax