Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix audit verifier action (and add variable initializations to other actions) #921

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

0xDEnYO
Copy link
Contributor

@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO commented Jan 13, 2025

Which Jira task belongs to this PR?

Why did I implement it this way?

Checklist before requesting a review

Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)

  • I have checked that any arbitrary calls to external contracts are validated and or restricted
  • I have checked that any privileged calls (i.e. storage modifications) are validated and or restricted
  • I have ensured that any new contracts have had AT A MINIMUM 1 preliminary audit conducted on by <company/auditor>

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a consistent pattern across multiple GitHub Actions workflows by adding a new environment variable CONTINUE, initialized to false. This variable is used to control workflow execution flow based on specific conditions such as team member retrieval, file modifications, or event types. The changes enhance error handling and provide more granular control over workflow steps across different GitHub Actions files in the .github/workflows and .github/workflows_deactivated directories.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ensureSCCoreDevApproval.yml Added CONTINUE environment variable to control job flow based on team member retrieval
.github/workflows/protectAuditLabels.yml Introduced CONTINUE to manage label protection checks based on event action and actor
.github/workflows/protectSecurityRelevantCode.yml Added CONTINUE to control workflow based on modified file checks and approval processes
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml Implemented CONTINUE to enhance audit verification process and error handling
.github/workflows/versionCheck.yml Added CONTINUE to manage version tag update checks and workflow execution
.github/workflows_deactivated/ensureDeployProcessIntegrity.yml Introduced CONTINUE to control job flow based on modified file presence
.github/workflows_deactivated/protectAuditFolder.yml Added CONTINUE to manage workflow execution based on team member retrieval

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ezynda3

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b22dec0 and 7926569.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/protectAuditLabels.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/enforceTestCoverage.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/ensureSCCoreDevApproval.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/protectAuditCompletedLabel.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/enforceTestCoverage.yml
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/protectAuditCompletedLabel.yml
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/ensureSCCoreDevApproval.yml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/protectAuditLabels.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: protect-critical-code
  • GitHub Check: core-dev-approval
  • GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
  • GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: generate-tag
  • GitHub Check: analyze

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows_deactivated/ensureDeployProcessIntegrity.yml (1)

Line range hint 94-95: Update comments to match actual group name.

There's a discrepancy between the comment mentioning 'information-security-manager' and the actual group name 'smart-contract-core' being used.

Update the comment or the group name to maintain consistency:

-          # GROUP_NAME='information-security-manager'
-          GROUP_NAME='smart-contract-core'
+          GROUP_NAME='information-security-manager' # Group responsible for security approvals
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
.github/workflows_deactivated/protectAuditFolder.yml (1)

18-19: LGTM! Consider using job outputs for better reliability.

While the CONTINUE environment variable initialization is correct, consider using job outputs instead of writing to a file for passing data between steps. This would prevent potential race conditions and improve reliability.

outputs:
  team_members: ${{ steps.get_members.outputs.members }}
.github/workflows/protectAuditLabels.yml (1)

18-19: Add permission check for enhanced security.

While the CONTINUE variable initialization is correct, consider adding a permission check to verify if the actor has write permissions before proceeding with label modifications.

Add this check after the actor verification:

- name: Check actor permissions
  if: env.CONTINUE == 'true'
  run: |
    PERMISSIONS=$(gh api \
      -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
      "/repos/${{ github.repository }}/collaborators/${{ github.actor }}/permission" \
      --jq '.permission')
    if [[ ! "$PERMISSIONS" =~ ^(admin|write)$ ]]; then
      echo "Actor does not have sufficient permissions"
      echo "CONTINUE=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
      exit 1
    fi
.github/workflows_deactivated/ensureDeployProcessIntegrity.yml (1)

14-15: LGTM! Consider improving error messages.

The CONTINUE variable initialization is correct. However, consider making error messages more specific by including the actual error reason.

.github/workflows/protectSecurityRelevantCode.yml (1)

Line range hint 67-67: Consider adding error messages when skipping steps.

When CONTINUE is false and steps are skipped, it would be helpful to log why they were skipped.

-    if: env.CONTINUE == 'true'
+    if: env.CONTINUE == 'true'
+    run: |
+      if [[ "$CONTINUE" != "true" ]]; then
+        echo "Skipping step as no protected files were found or an error occurred in previous steps"
+      fi

Also applies to: 91-91

.github/workflows/versionCheck.yml (1)

Line range hint 163-163: Consider adding timeout for the audit log check.

The always() condition with continue-on-error: true could potentially lead to long-running checks. Consider adding a timeout.

-        if: always() && env.CONTINUE == 'true'
+        if: always() && env.CONTINUE == 'true'
+        timeout-minutes: 10
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (1)

396-400: Consider adding logging for label removal.

When removing the AuditCompleted label, it would be helpful to log the specific condition that triggered the removal.

         if: ${{ always() && env.AUDIT_COMPLETED_ASSIGNED && (env.CONTINUE == 'false' || (env.CONTINUE == 'true' && env.AUDIT_REQUIRED == 'false'))}}
+        run: |
+          echo "Removing AuditCompleted label due to:"
+          if [[ "$CONTINUE" == "false" ]]; then
+            echo "- Previous steps failed"
+          elif [[ "$AUDIT_REQUIRED" == "false" ]]; then
+            echo "- Audit is not required for these changes"
+          fi
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb12d93 and de72bc3.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .github/workflows/ensureSCCoreDevApproval.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/protectAuditLabels.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/protectSecurityRelevantCode.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (5 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/versionCheck.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/ensureDeployProcessIntegrity.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/ensureSCCoreDevApproval.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/protectAuditFolder.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
.github/workflows/protectSecurityRelevantCode.yml (1)
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#853
File: .github/workflows/protectSecurityRelevantCode.yml:67-100
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:43:10.543Z
Learning: In the `.github/workflows/protectSecurityRelevantCode.yml` file, suggested security improvements for configuring organization and team names as environment variables, handling API rate limits, addressing potential file permission issues, and mitigating command injection risks are not required.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
  • GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: generate-tag
  • GitHub Check: analyze
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/protectSecurityRelevantCode.yml (1)

16-17: LGTM! Good practice initializing the CONTINUE variable.

The initialization of CONTINUE as false by default is a safe approach, ensuring explicit opt-in for critical security checks.

.github/workflows/versionCheck.yml (1)

21-22: LGTM! Good practice initializing the CONTINUE variable.

The initialization of CONTINUE as false by default is a safe approach for version control checks.

.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (2)

Line range hint 403-407: LGTM! Good practice for final failure handling.

The final step properly ensures that the workflow fails if any critical checks failed, maintaining security integrity.


Line range hint 385-391: Verify the order of condition evaluation.

The complex condition always() && env.AUDIT_REQUIRED == 'true' && env.CONTINUE == 'true' relies on the order of evaluation. Consider breaking it down for clarity and adding comments.

✅ Verification successful

Complex conditions are properly ordered and safe

The conditions follow a consistent and logical pattern across the workflow:

  • always() ensures execution regardless of previous steps
  • env.CONTINUE acts as a safety gate
  • Additional conditions provide context-specific validation

While adding comments for clarity would be beneficial (like the one at line 1), the current implementation is correct and safe.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if similar complex conditions exist in other workflow files
rg -A 2 "always\(\) && env\." .github/workflows/

Length of output: 1205

.github/workflows_deactivated/ensureSCCoreDevApproval.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ensureSCCoreDevApproval.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@lifi-action-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

lifi-action-bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Test Coverage Report

Line Coverage: 78.66% (2238 / 2845 lines)
Function Coverage: 84.71% ( 388 / 458 functions)
Branch Coverage: 39.60% ( 221 / 558 branches)
Test coverage (78.66%) is above min threshold (76%). Check passed.

@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2025 02:31
@lifi-action-bot lifi-action-bot changed the title added env variable initializations to git actions added env variable initializations to git actions [AcrossFacet v2.1.0] Jan 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit_OLD.yml (3)

172-173: Remove unused variables.

The variables COMMIT_HASHES_FILE and AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE are declared but never used.

-          COMMIT_HASHES_FILE="commit_hashes.txt"
-          AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE="auditor_handles.txt"

393-393: Fix label removal conditions.

The conditions for label removal are complex and might lead to unexpected behavior. Consider simplifying the logic and adding comments explaining the conditions.

-        continue-on-error: true # This ensures the step will execute even if the job has a failed status.
+        continue-on-error: true # Ensure label removal happens even if previous steps failed
-        if: ${{ env.AUDIT_COMPLETED_ASSIGNED && (env.CONTINUE == 'false' || (env.CONTINUE == 'true' && env.AUDIT_REQUIRED == 'false'))}}
+        if: ${{ env.AUDIT_COMPLETED_ASSIGNED && (env.CONTINUE != 'true' || env.AUDIT_REQUIRED != 'true') }}

Also applies to: 395-395


1-406: Consider adding workflow versioning.

Since this is a critical workflow for security audits, consider adding version tracking to help with debugging and rollbacks.

Add this at the top of the file:

 name: Audit Verifier
+# Version: 1.0.0
 # - checks if an audit is required and assigns a (protected) label based on the result ('AuditRequired' or 'AuditNotRequired')
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:9:1: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:10:1: AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2027:warning:122:94: The surrounding quotes actually unquote this. Remove or escape them

(shellcheck)


163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:122:94: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:159:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between de72bc3 and efa6549.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (5 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/verifyAudit_OLD.yml (1 hunks)
  • audit/auditLog.json (1 hunks)
  • src/Facets/AcrossFacet.sol (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit_OLD.yml

163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:9:1: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:10:1: AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2027:warning:122:94: The surrounding quotes actually unquote this. Remove or escape them

(shellcheck)


163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:122:94: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:159:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
  • GitHub Check: generate-tag
  • GitHub Check: analyze
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/Facets/AcrossFacet.sol (1)

16-16: Version increment requires justification.

The version bump from 2.0.0 to 2.1.0 suggests a minor feature addition, but the only change is an empty function. Please provide justification for this version increment or revert it until meaningful changes are implemented.

audit/auditLog.json (1)

Line range hint 72-400: LGTM! The audit log entries are well-structured and complete.

The new audit entries maintain consistency with the existing format and include all required fields. The contract versions are properly referenced in the auditedContracts section.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 73-73: expected , but instead found "audit20241205"

Remove "audit20241205"

(parse)

.github/workflows/verifyAudit_OLD.yml (1)

332-374: Consider enabling PR review verification.

The PR review verification logic is currently disabled but seems important for ensuring proper audit workflow. Consider enabling this after verifying compatibility with your flow.

Run this script to check recent PR patterns:

src/Facets/AcrossFacet.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/verifyAudit_OLD.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/verifyAudit_OLD.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (2)

174-174: Remove redundant environment variable logging.

The echo "CONTINUE=$CONTINUE" statement is redundant and adds noise to the logs.

-echo "CONTINUE=$CONTINUE"
-

Also applies to: 177-179


175-175: Address shellcheck warnings in the script.

Several shellcheck warnings need to be addressed:

  1. Unused variables: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE and AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE
  2. Quoting issues in string comparisons

Apply these fixes:

  1. Remove unused variables or mark them as intentionally unused
  2. Fix string comparison quoting:
-if echo "$COMMIT_LIST" | grep -q "$TARGET_COMMIT"; then
+if echo "$COMMIT_LIST" | grep -q "${TARGET_COMMIT}"; then
  1. Add proper quoting:
-echo "Could not find an audit report in path $AUDIT_REPORT_PATH for contract "$FILENAME".\033[0m"
+echo "Could not find an audit report in path $AUDIT_REPORT_PATH for contract \"$FILENAME\".\033[0m"
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:12:1: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:13:1: AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2027:warning:125:94: The surrounding quotes actually unquote this. Remove or escape them

(shellcheck)


175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:125:94: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:162:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between efa6549 and bcac001.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml

175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:12:1: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:13:1: AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2027:warning:125:94: The surrounding quotes actually unquote this. Remove or escape them

(shellcheck)


175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:125:94: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


175-175: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:162:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
  • GitHub Check: generate-tag
  • GitHub Check: analyze
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (7)

28-28: LGTM! Good practice for environment variable initialization.

The explicit initialization of CONTINUE=false ensures consistent behavior across all execution paths.


49-50: LGTM! Proper error handling with environment variable update.

Good practice to explicitly update the CONTINUE variable before exiting, maintaining consistent state tracking.


132-137: LGTM! Proper cleanup of AuditCompleted label.

Good practice to remove the AuditCompleted label early in the process to prevent stale state.


168-170: LGTM! Proper state management for subsequent steps.

Good practice to explicitly set CONTINUE=true after successful label verification.


399-399: LGTM! Comprehensive condition for AuditCompleted label assignment.

The condition properly checks all required states: always(), AUDIT_REQUIRED=true, and CONTINUE=true.


410-410: LGTM! Proper condition for AuditCompleted label removal.

The condition correctly handles both cases where the label should be removed:

  1. When the check fails (CONTINUE=false)
  2. When the check passes but audit is not required (CONTINUE=true && AUDIT_REQUIRED=false)

417-417: LGTM! Proper job failure handling.

Good practice to explicitly fail the job when critical steps fail (CONTINUE=false).

.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@lifi-action-bot lifi-action-bot changed the title added env variable initializations to git actions [AcrossFacet v2.1.0] added env variable initializations to git actions Jan 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (3)

49-50: Consider adding error details to the environment.

When setting CONTINUE=false, it would be helpful to also set an error message variable for better debugging.

- echo "CONTINUE=false" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
+ echo "CONTINUE=false" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
+ echo "ERROR_MESSAGE=No files found in the PR" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"

167-168: Use consistent environment variable export method.

The script uses both core.exportVariable and echo >> $GITHUB_ENV for setting environment variables. Consider using a single method throughout the workflow for consistency.

- core.exportVariable('CONTINUE', 'true');
+ console.log("CONTINUE=true" >> "$GITHUB_ENV");

Line range hint 125-125: Fix shellcheck warnings about quoting.

The static analysis found potential issues with quoting in the error message:

- echo -e "\033[31mCould not find an audit report in path $AUDIT_REPORT_PATH for contract "$FILENAME".\033[0m"
+ echo -e "\033[31mCould not find an audit report in path $AUDIT_REPORT_PATH for contract '$FILENAME'.\033[0m"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bcac001 and 3684bff.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml

174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:12:1: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:13:1: AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2027:warning:125:94: The surrounding quotes actually unquote this. Remove or escape them

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:125:94: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:162:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
  • GitHub Check: analyze
  • GitHub Check: generate-tag
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (5)

28-28: LGTM! Good practice initializing the CONTINUE variable.

The explicit initialization of CONTINUE=false ensures consistent behavior across all execution paths.


131-135: LGTM! Good practice removing AuditCompleted label early.

Early removal of the AuditCompleted label ensures the audit state is reset before verification begins.


173-173: LGTM! Good practice with conditional execution and state reset.

The combination of always() with env.CONTINUE check ensures the audit log is always verified when needed, and the explicit reset of CONTINUE=false provides a safe default state.

Also applies to: 179-181


398-398: LGTM! Well-structured conditional label management.

The conditions for label assignment and removal are comprehensive and handle all edge cases:

  • Line 398: Assigns label only when required and all checks pass
  • Line 409: Removes label when checks fail or audit is not required
  • Line 416: Fails the action when critical steps fail

Also applies to: 409-409, 416-416


174-174: Address shellcheck warnings about unused variables.

The static analysis found unused variables that should be addressed:

  • COMMIT_HASHES_FILE
  • AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE

Remove the unused variables if they are not needed:

- COMMIT_HASHES_FILE="commit_hashes.txt"
- AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE="auditor_handles.txt"
✅ Verification successful

The review comment is correct - these variables are unused and can be safely removed.

The variables COMMIT_HASHES_FILE and AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE are defined but never used in the workflow. They appear to be remnants from an earlier implementation, as the functionality they were intended for is now handled differently in the script (using direct GitHub CLI commands and JSON processing).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify if these variables are used elsewhere in the codebase
rg "COMMIT_HASHES_FILE|AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE" -A 5

Length of output: 55


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's see the complete workflow file
cat .github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml

# Also do a case-insensitive search
rg -i "commit.*hash.*file|auditor.*handle.*file"

Length of output: 21490

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:12:1: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:13:1: AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2027:warning:125:94: The surrounding quotes actually unquote this. Remove or escape them

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:125:94: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:162:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

@lifi-action-bot lifi-action-bot changed the title added env variable initializations to git actions added env variable initializations to git actions [AcrossFacet v2.1.0] Jan 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/Facets/AcrossFacet.sol (1)

Remove test function and follow version control best practices

The empty bla() function appears to be a test artifact and should be removed from production code. Additionally:

  • Remove the empty bla() function as it serves no purpose
  • Document version changes in a changelog
  • Consider reverting version bump until changes are properly documented
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-150: Address audit verification failure.

The pipeline shows that audit verification failed. Given that this is a critical financial contract handling token bridges, please ensure that:

  1. All changes have undergone the required preliminary audit as per the PR checklist
  2. The audit log is properly formatted and includes these changes
  3. The empty external function and version bump are covered by the audit

Let's check the audit logs:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for audit logs
fd -g "*audit*.{md,txt,log}" -X cat

# Check commit history for audit-related commits
git log --grep="audit"

Length of output: 37


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for recent changes to the file
git log -p -- src/Facets/AcrossFacet.sol

# Look for version control and documentation files
fd -g "{CHANGELOG,VERSION,README}.md" -X cat

# Search for audit-related content in docs
fd -g "docs/**" -X grep -l "audit" || true

# Check if bla() function is new
git log -S "function bla"

Length of output: 11742


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check deployment docs
cat docs/Deploy.md || true

# Look for PR templates and contribution guidelines
fd -g "{CONTRIBUTING,PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE}.md" -X cat
fd -g ".github/**/{CONTRIBUTING,PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE}.md" -X cat

# Search for security policy
fd -g "SECURITY.md" -X cat
fd -g ".github/**/SECURITY.md" -X cat

# Check if this is a draft PR
gh pr view --json isDraft,title,body || true

Length of output: 5125


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check hidden .github files
fd -H -g ".github/**/{CONTRIBUTING,PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE,SECURITY}.md" -X cat

# Search for any files containing "audit" in their content
fd -H -t f -X grep -l "audit|security" || true

# Look for version control files
fd -H -g "{package.json,hardhat.config*,foundry.toml}" -X cat

Length of output: 13196

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Audit Verifier

[error] Failed to verify audit information due to malformed audit log.

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/Facets/AcrossFacet.sol (1)

49-50: ⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Remove placeholder function.

The empty function bla() appears to be a placeholder. In a financial contract handling token bridges, any unnecessary external functions increase the attack surface.

Please remove this function as it:

  1. Has external visibility making it callable by anyone
  2. Lacks implementation and documentation
  3. Doesn't follow the contract's naming conventions
  4. Could pose security risks if deployed
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Audit Verifier

[error] Failed to verify audit information due to malformed audit log.

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (2)

131-135: Consider adding a comment explaining the AuditCompleted label removal.

The removal of the AuditCompleted label is a critical operation that affects the audit verification flow. Adding a comment would help explain why this is necessary at this stage.

+            // Remove AuditCompleted label to ensure re-verification of audit status
             if (assignedLabels.includes('AuditCompleted')) {

173-181: Consider consolidating environment variable conditions.

The condition always() && env.AUDIT_REQUIRED == 'true' && env.CONTINUE == 'true' is used multiple times. Consider extracting it to a reusable job output.

    outputs:
      should_check_audit:
        description: "Whether audit checks should proceed"
        value: ${{ always() && env.AUDIT_REQUIRED == 'true' && env.CONTINUE == 'true' }}
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:12:1: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:13:1: AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2027:warning:125:94: The surrounding quotes actually unquote this. Remove or escape them

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:125:94: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:162:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3684bff and b22dec0.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (7 hunks)
  • audit/auditLog.json (2 hunks)
  • src/Facets/AcrossFacet.sol (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • audit/auditLog.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml

174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:12:1: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:13:1: AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2027:warning:125:94: The surrounding quotes actually unquote this. Remove or escape them

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:125:94: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:162:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Audit Verifier
src/Facets/AcrossFacet.sol

[error] Failed to verify audit information due to malformed audit log.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
  • GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: generate-tag
  • GitHub Check: analyze
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml (6)

28-28: LGTM! Good practice initializing the CONTINUE variable.

The explicit initialization of CONTINUE=false ensures consistent behavior across all execution paths.


49-50: LGTM! Proper error handling with environment variable.

Good practice to explicitly set CONTINUE=false before exiting with an error, ensuring consistent state management.


167-168: LGTM! Proper control flow management.

Good practice to explicitly set CONTINUE=true after successful label verification, enabling subsequent steps.


Line range hint 398-409: LGTM! Robust label management with proper conditions.

The conditions for assigning and removing the AuditCompleted label are well-structured:

  • Assignment: always() && env.AUDIT_REQUIRED == 'true' && env.CONTINUE == 'true'
  • Removal: always() && env.AUDIT_COMPLETED_ASSIGNED && (env.CONTINUE == 'false' || (env.CONTINUE == 'true' && env.AUDIT_REQUIRED == 'false'))

Line range hint 416-421: LGTM! Proper job failure handling.

Good practice to:

  1. Use always() to ensure the step runs regardless of previous step status
  2. Check env.CONTINUE == 'false' to fail the job when critical steps failed
  3. Provide a clear error message before failing

174-174: Address unused variables flagged by shellcheck.

The static analysis tool identified unused variables:

  • COMMIT_HASHES_FILE
  • AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE

Either remove these variables or document why they're needed for future use.

✅ Verification successful

Remove unused temporary file variables

The review comment is correct. The variables COMMIT_HASHES_FILE and AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE are defined but never used in the workflow. They can be safely removed as the workflow processes commit hashes and auditor handles without using these temporary files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify if these variables are used elsewhere in the codebase
rg "COMMIT_HASHES_FILE|AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE" --type yaml

Length of output: 62


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete workflow file content
cat .github/workflows/verifyAudit.yml

# Also search case-insensitive for similar patterns
rg -i "commit.*hash.*file|auditor.*git.*handle.*file" --type yaml

Length of output: 21546

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:12:1: COMMIT_HASHES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:13:1: AUDITOR_GIT_HANDLES_FILE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2027:warning:125:94: The surrounding quotes actually unquote this. Remove or escape them

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:125:94: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:162:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

src/Facets/AcrossFacet.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lifi-action-bot lifi-action-bot changed the title added env variable initializations to git actions [AcrossFacet v2.1.0] added env variable initializations to git actions Jan 16, 2025
@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO changed the title added env variable initializations to git actions Fix audit verifier action (and add variable initializations to other actions) Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants