Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fn: improvements for GoroutineManager #9270

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

starius
Copy link
Collaborator

@starius starius commented Nov 14, 2024

Change Description

Method Go() was changed to return a (success) bool instead of an error. This is needed to simplify handling of its result, since only ErrStopping could be returned, not any other error. See #9140 (comment)

Also test TestGoroutineManagerStopsStress was added to make sure there is no race condition between Done() and Wait() methods in the GoroutineManager implementation. See #9141 (comment)

Steps to Test

cd fn
go test

Pull Request Checklist

Testing

  • Your PR passes all CI checks.
  • Tests covering the positive and negative (error paths) are included.
  • Bug fixes contain tests triggering the bug to prevent regressions.

Code Style and Documentation

📝 Please see our Contribution Guidelines for further guidance.

Make sure there is no race condition between Done() and Wait() methods in the
GoroutineManager implementation.

See lightningnetwork#9141 (comment)
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@starius starius marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 15:21
@saubyk saubyk requested a review from ellemouton November 14, 2024 15:25
@saubyk saubyk added this to the v0.19.0 milestone Nov 14, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (maybe no need for this stresstest, given the waitgroup implementation)

Comment on lines 28 to 29
// Go starts a new goroutine if the manager is not stopping and returns if it
// started a new goroutine.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Go tries to start a new goroutine and returns a boolean indicating its success ?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed. I added a note about when it succeeds.

// Go tries to start a new goroutine and returns a boolean indicating its
// success. It fails iff the goroutine manager is stopping or its context passed
// to NewGoroutineManager has expired.
func (g *GoroutineManager) Go(f func(ctx context.Context)) bool {

Comment on lines +124 to +127
// TestGoroutineManagerStopsStress launches many Stop() calls in parallel with a
// task exiting. It attempts to catch a race condition between wg.Done() and
// wg.Wait() calls. According to documentation of wg.Wait() this is acceptable,
// therefore this test passes even with -race.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given the implementation of WaitGroups I think we don't need this Stresstest anymore or ? There is no problem in calling wg.Done()and potentially reaching a counter of 0. Only adding new Goroutines are a problem and cause potential race conditions.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would keep it as a safeguard in case we change the implementation of GoroutineManager in the future, and the new implementation is not resilient to this scenario.

@starius starius force-pushed the goroutine-manager-bool branch from 9665385 to 891e962 Compare November 14, 2024 18:03
Copy link
Collaborator

@ellemouton ellemouton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! thanks 🙏

@guggero
Copy link
Collaborator

guggero commented Nov 19, 2024

Going to merge this and push a tag v2.0.1. Though just a heads up: Because of the recently merged #8985, you won't be able to use this new v2.0.1 tag without also changing a bunch of things that were broken during the v2 API changes. So you might want to team up with @ProofOfKeags for that.

@guggero guggero merged commit c136901 into lightningnetwork:master Nov 19, 2024
26 of 33 checks passed
@starius starius deleted the goroutine-manager-bool branch November 19, 2024 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants