fix(deps): update dependency io.minio:minio to v8.5.17 - autoclosed

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
io.minio:minio	8.5.16 -> 8.5.17

---

Release Notes

minio/minio-java (io.minio:minio)

v8.5.17: Bugfix Release

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Error out on invalid content type by @​balamurugana in https://github.com/minio/minio-java/pull/1617

Full Changelog: minio/minio-java@8.5.16...8.5.17

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[sourcery-ai]

审阅者指南 by Sourcery

此拉取请求将 io.minio:minio 依赖从版本 8.5.16 更新到 8.5.17。这是一个修复版本，解决了无效内容类型的问题。

显示 MinIO 内容类型验证的序列图

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant MinIO
    participant Storage

    Client->>MinIO: Upload object with content type
    alt Invalid content type
        MinIO-->>Client: Error: Invalid content type
    else Valid content type
        MinIO->>Storage: Store object with content type
        Storage-->>MinIO: Success
        MinIO-->>Client: Success response
    end

Loading

文件级别变更

变更	详情	文件
将 minio 依赖更新到最新的修复版本。	将 minio 版本从 8.5.16 更新到 8.5.17	gradle/libs.versions.toml

---

提示和命令

与 Sourcery 交互

• 触发新的审阅： 在拉取请求中评论 @sourcery-ai review。
• 继续讨论： 直接回复 Sourcery 的审阅评论。
• 从审阅评论生成 GitHub 问题： 通过回复评论，要求 Sourcery 从审阅评论创建问题。
• 生成拉取请求标题： 在拉取请求标题的任何位置写 @sourcery-ai 以随时生成标题。
• 生成拉取请求摘要： 在拉取请求正文的任何位置写 @sourcery-ai summary 以随时生成 PR 摘要。您还可以使用此命令指定摘要应插入的位置。

自定义您的体验

访问您的仪表板以：

• 启用或禁用审阅功能，如 Sourcery 生成的拉取请求摘要、审阅者指南等。
• 更改审阅语言。
• 添加、删除或编辑自定义审阅说明。
• 调整其他审阅设置。

获取帮助

• 联系我们的支持团队提出问题或反馈。
• 访问我们的文档获取详细指南和信息。
• 通过关注我们的 X/Twitter、LinkedIn 或 GitHub 与 Sourcery 团队保持联系。

Original review guide in English

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the io.minio:minio dependency from version 8.5.16 to 8.5.17. This is a bugfix release that addresses an issue with invalid content types.

Sequence diagram showing MinIO content type validation

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant MinIO
    participant Storage

    Client->>MinIO: Upload object with content type
    alt Invalid content type
        MinIO-->>Client: Error: Invalid content type
    else Valid content type
        MinIO->>Storage: Store object with content type
        Storage-->>MinIO: Success
        MinIO-->>Client: Success response
    end

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated the minio dependency to the latest bugfix version.	Updated the minio version from 8.5.16 to 8.5.17	gradle/libs.versions.toml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

我们跳过了对这个拉取请求的审查。看起来这是由机器人创建的（嘿，renovate[bot]！）。我们假设它知道自己在做什么！

Original comment in English

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, renovate[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 59.20%. Comparing base (de2a202) to head (9d50d2e).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #553      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     59.23%   59.20%   -0.04%     
+ Complexity     1234     1233       -1     
============================================
  Files           431      431              
  Lines          5103     5103              
  Branches        359      359              
============================================
- Hits           3023     3021       -2     
- Misses         1858     1860       +2     
  Partials        222      222              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.