Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RISCV][NFC] Fix a warning #127090

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

[RISCV][NFC] Fix a warning #127090

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

pfusik
Copy link
Contributor

@pfusik pfusik commented Feb 13, 2025

No description provided.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 13, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v

Author: Piotr Fusik (pfusik)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127090.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVMV0Elimination.cpp (+4-4)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVMV0Elimination.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVMV0Elimination.cpp
index efd92c55e3adf..ccc86da340440 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVMV0Elimination.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVMV0Elimination.cpp
@@ -159,10 +159,10 @@ bool RISCVVMV0Elimination::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
         if (MO.isReg() && MO.getReg().isVirtual() &&
             MRI.getRegClass(MO.getReg()) == &RISCV::VMV0RegClass) {
           MRI.recomputeRegClass(MO.getReg());
-          assert(MRI.getRegClass(MO.getReg()) != &RISCV::VMV0RegClass ||
-                 MI.isInlineAsm() ||
-                 MRI.getVRegDef(MO.getReg())->isInlineAsm() &&
-                     "Non-inline-asm use of vmv0 left behind");
+          assert((MRI.getRegClass(MO.getReg()) != &RISCV::VMV0RegClass ||
+                  MI.isInlineAsm() ||
+                  MRI.getVRegDef(MO.getReg())->isInlineAsm()) &&
+                 "Non-inline-asm use of vmv0 left behind");
         }
       }
     }

Copy link
Contributor

@lukel97 lukel97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks

@lukel97
Copy link
Contributor

lukel97 commented Feb 13, 2025

Looks like my version of Clang isn't reporting this. Were you seeing this on GCC/a newer Clang?

@pfusik
Copy link
Contributor Author

pfusik commented Feb 13, 2025

gcc version 11.4.0 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04)

/home/p.fusik/upstream/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVMV0Elimination.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool {anonymous}::RISCVVMV0Elimination::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&)’:
/home/p.fusik/upstream/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVMV0Elimination.cpp:164: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘&&’ within ‘||’ [-Wparentheses]
  164 |                  MRI.getVRegDef(MO.getReg())->isInlineAsm() &&
      |                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  165 |                      "Non-inline-asm use of vmv0 left behind");
      |

@pfusik pfusik merged commit 0078e8f into llvm:main Feb 13, 2025
10 checks passed
joaosaffran pushed a commit to joaosaffran/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants