Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tickets/dm41284: Updated love_stress_test to define 'location' URL based on the test environment #86

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

rbovill
Copy link
Contributor

@rbovill rbovill commented Oct 31, 2023

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@mareuter mareuter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How are we going to be able to test the k8s systems as well? This looks hardcoded for the bare metal ones.

@sebastian-aranda
Copy link
Contributor

sebastian-aranda commented Nov 2, 2023

How are we going to be able to test the k8s systems as well? This looks hardcoded for the bare metal ones.

As @mareuter state, we should also include the k8s instances too. Although in order to do that I'll need to adjust a bit the script as its server URL is kind of hardcoded: https://github.com/lsst-ts/ts_externalscripts/blob/develop/python/lsst/ts/externalscripts/make_love_stress_tests.py#L86.
The k8s instances use HTTPS whereas the bare metal machines uses HTTP, that blocks us for setting the location for those instances as the script needs to understand that to avoid redirections. I've created DM-41536 to track work on that.

Copy link
Contributor

@sebastian-aranda sebastian-aranda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Besides my follow up to @mareuter comment, this looks good.

@rbovill rbovill merged commit 2098d0e into develop Nov 2, 2023
2 checks passed
@rbovill rbovill deleted the tickets/DM-41284 branch November 2, 2023 17:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants