Solution #2207
Solution #2207
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on implementing the formatDate function! 🎉 Your solution meets the task requirements and constraints effectively. While there are a couple of areas for improvement, such as ensuring the input formats are valid and handling delimiters more flexibly, these are minor and do not impact the core functionality. Keep up the great work and consider these suggestions for future enhancements! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| @@ -8,7 +8,29 @@ | |||
| * @returns {string} | |||
| */ | |||
| function formatDate(date, fromFormat, toFormat) { | |||
| // write code here | |||
| const dateParts = date.split(fromFormat[3]); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The assumption that the delimiter is always at the fourth position in the fromFormat array might not be safe. Ensure that the format arrays are always structured as expected, or consider a more flexible approach to determine the delimiter.
| dateObj[part] = dateParts[index]; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (fromFormat.includes('YYYY') && toFormat.includes('YY')) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that the input formats are valid and consistent with the expected structure. The current logic assumes that 'YYYY' and 'YY' are mutually exclusive in the formats, which should be validated before processing.
No description provided.