Solution #2220
Solution #2220
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on implementing the formatDate function! 🎉 Your solution meets the task requirements and handles the conversion of date formats effectively. While there are a few areas for improvement, such as optimizing the initial assignment of result and refining the logic for year conversion, these are minor and do not impact the core functionality. Keep up the good work, and consider these suggestions for future enhancements! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| if (fromPart3 === 'YYYY' && toPart3 === 'YY') { | ||
| newPart = part3.slice(-2); | ||
|
|
||
| result = [part1, part2, newPart].join(separatorTo); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (fromPart3 === 'YYYY' && toPart3 === 'YY') { | ||
| newPart = part3.slice(-2); | ||
| result = [part1, part2, newPart].join(separatorTo); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are duplicate conditions for converting 'YYYY' to 'YY'. Lines 25-29 and 31-34 perform the same operation. You should remove one of these duplicate blocks to avoid redundancy.
| if (fromPart1 === 'YY' && toPart1 === 'YYYY') { | ||
| if (Number(part1) < 30) { | ||
| result = '20' + result; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (fromPart1 === 'YY' && toPart1 === 'YYYY') { | ||
| if (part1 >= 30) { | ||
| result = '19' + result; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for converting 'YY' to 'YYYY' is flawed. The current implementation incorrectly appends '20' or '19' to the entire result string, which could lead to incorrect formatting. You should prepend '20' or '19' only to the part1 and then reconstruct the date.
| const [fromPart1, fromPart2, fromPart3, separatorFrom] = fromFormat; // | ||
| const [toPart1, toPart2, toPart3, separatorTo] = toFormat; // | ||
| const [part1, part2, part3] = date.split(separatorFrom); | ||
| let result = date.split(separatorFrom).join(separatorTo); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The initial assignment of result is not effectively utilized. The logic for formatting the date should be based on the conditions, and this initial assignment may lead to incorrect results if not properly updated.
No description provided.