Solution #785
Solution #785
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like you've done a great job covering most scenarios for the splitInteger function! 🎉 However, there's a critical issue with the test case splitInteger(1, 0). According to the task description, numberOfParts should always be a positive integer, so this test case is incorrect and should be revised or removed. Once this is addressed, your solution will be ready to go! Keep up the great work! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
src/splitInteger.test.js
Outdated
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { | ||
|
|
||
| expect(splitInteger(1, 0)).toEqual([]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test case splitInteger(1, 0) is incorrect because numberOfParts should always be a positive integer. This test case should be revised or removed as it does not align with the task description.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on providing well-structured test cases for the splitInteger function! 🎉 Your test cases cover various scenarios effectively, including splitting a number into equal parts, handling single-part splits, ensuring sorted parts, and adding zeros when necessary. This aligns well with the task requirements.
However, there's a critical issue with the test case splitInteger(1, 2). According to the task description, numberOfParts should always be a positive integer that is less than or equal to the value being split. This test case violates that condition and should be revised or removed to ensure the function's correctness.
Remember, addressing such critical issues is essential for the functionality of your code. Moving forward, please review the comments and make necessary adjustments to improve your code. This decision is made to help you progress in your learning journey. Keep up the good work and continue to learn from these experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { | ||
|
|
||
| expect(splitInteger(1, 2)).toEqual([0, 1]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test case splitInteger(1, 2) is incorrect because numberOfParts should be less than or equal to the value being split, according to the task description. Consider revising or removing this test case.
No description provided.