Solution #793
Solution #793
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on implementing the splitInteger function! 🎉 Your code meets the task requirements and constraints effectively. The function is well-structured, and the test cases cover a variety of scenarios. While there are minor issues, such as the test logic for isDifferenceValid and the ESLint rule for 'no-proto', they do not significantly impact the functionality. Keep up the good work, and consider refining these areas for even better code quality in the future! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| 'no-proto': 0, | ||
| strict: 0, | ||
| 'max-len': 0, | ||
| 'no-proto': 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The rule 'no-proto' is set to 0, which effectively turns it off. Ensure this is intentional, as using 'proto' is generally discouraged due to potential security and performance issues.
src/splitInteger.test.js
Outdated
| expect(isDifferenceValid(splitInteger(17, 4))).toEqual( | ||
| isDifferenceValid(splitInteger(17, 4)) | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test here is not effectively testing the isDifferenceValid function. It compares the result of isDifferenceValid(splitInteger(17, 4)) with itself, which will always be true. Consider testing the function with different inputs to ensure it behaves as expected.
Have a nice day!