-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 722
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solution #753
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Solution #753
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTML
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your hard work on this pull request! 😊 While your code is well-structured and mostly aligns with the task requirements, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve it:
-
Unique Constraint on Genre Name: The
Genre
model should have a unique constraint on thename
field. This is important to prevent duplicate genre names in the database. -
Handling Many-to-Many Relationships in
MovieSerializer
: TheMovieSerializer
currently uses nested serializers foractors
andgenres
, but it does not handle the many-to-many relationships correctly in thecreate
andupdate
methods. You should implement logic to manage these relationships, typically by using theset()
method on the many-to-many fields.
These issues are crucial for ensuring the functionality and integrity of the application. Once these are addressed, your code will be in great shape! Keep up the great work, and feel free to reach out if you need any assistance. 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review
button in the Reviewers tab.
cinema/serializers.py
Outdated
actors = ActorSerializer(many=True, required=False) | ||
genres = GenreSerializer(many=True, required=False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The MovieSerializer
currently uses nested serializers for actors
and genres
, but the create
and update
methods do not handle these many-to-many relationships. Consider implementing logic to add or update the related Actor
and Genre
instances when creating or updating a Movie
instance. This typically involves handling the validated_data
for these fields separately and using methods like set()
on the many-to-many fields.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Summary
Great job on addressing most of the issues from the previous review! 🎉 Your implementation shows a solid understanding of Django models, views, and serializers. Here are some key points and areas for improvement:
-
Unique Constraint on Genre Name: You've successfully added a unique constraint on the
name
field of theGenre
model, which is crucial for preventing duplicate genre names. This aligns perfectly with the task requirements. ✅ -
Handling Many-to-Many Relationships in
MovieSerializer
: The current implementation ofMovieSerializer
does not handle the many-to-many relationships foractors
andgenres
in thecreate
andupdate
methods. To improve this, consider extracting these fields fromvalidated_data
, creating theMovie
instance without them, and then using theset()
method to manage these relationships. This will ensure that theMovie
instances are correctly associated with their respectiveactors
andgenres
. 🔧 -
Overall Structure and Configuration: Your project structure, including
views.py
,urls.py
, andsettings.py
, is well-organized and follows best practices. The use of environment variables for sensitive information like the secret key is commendable. 👏
While there are some areas that need attention, particularly in the MovieSerializer
, the decision to approve this pull request is made to help you move forward with your learning journey. Please make sure to address the handling of many-to-many relationships in the serializer to enhance the functionality of your code. Keep up the great work, and continue to learn from these experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
fields=[ | ||
('id', models.BigAutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')), | ||
('name', models.CharField(max_length=50)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The Genre
model should have a unique constraint on the name
field to prevent duplicate entries. You can add unique=True
to the CharField
definition for name
.
def create(self, validated_data): | ||
return Movie.objects.create(**validated_data) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The create
method in MovieSerializer
should handle the many-to-many relationships for actors
and genres
. Consider extracting these fields from validated_data
, creating the Movie
instance without them, and then using the set()
method to add them to the instance.
No description provided.