Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution #753

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Solution #753

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

MrEgorLite
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@spa7id spa7id left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTML

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


Thank you for your hard work on this pull request! 😊 While your code is well-structured and mostly aligns with the task requirements, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve it:

  1. Unique Constraint on Genre Name: The Genre model should have a unique constraint on the name field. This is important to prevent duplicate genre names in the database.

  2. Handling Many-to-Many Relationships in MovieSerializer: The MovieSerializer currently uses nested serializers for actors and genres, but it does not handle the many-to-many relationships correctly in the create and update methods. You should implement logic to manage these relationships, typically by using the set() method on the many-to-many fields.

These issues are crucial for ensuring the functionality and integrity of the application. Once these are addressed, your code will be in great shape! Keep up the great work, and feel free to reach out if you need any assistance. 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

Comment on lines 49 to 50
actors = ActorSerializer(many=True, required=False)
genres = GenreSerializer(many=True, required=False)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The MovieSerializer currently uses nested serializers for actors and genres, but the create and update methods do not handle these many-to-many relationships. Consider implementing logic to add or update the related Actor and Genre instances when creating or updating a Movie instance. This typically involves handling the validated_data for these fields separately and using methods like set() on the many-to-many fields.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great job on addressing most of the issues from the previous review! 🎉 Your implementation shows a solid understanding of Django models, views, and serializers. Here are some key points and areas for improvement:

  1. Unique Constraint on Genre Name: You've successfully added a unique constraint on the name field of the Genre model, which is crucial for preventing duplicate genre names. This aligns perfectly with the task requirements. ✅

  2. Handling Many-to-Many Relationships in MovieSerializer: The current implementation of MovieSerializer does not handle the many-to-many relationships for actors and genres in the create and update methods. To improve this, consider extracting these fields from validated_data, creating the Movie instance without them, and then using the set() method to manage these relationships. This will ensure that the Movie instances are correctly associated with their respective actors and genres. 🔧

  3. Overall Structure and Configuration: Your project structure, including views.py, urls.py, and settings.py, is well-organized and follows best practices. The use of environment variables for sensitive information like the secret key is commendable. 👏

While there are some areas that need attention, particularly in the MovieSerializer, the decision to approve this pull request is made to help you move forward with your learning journey. Please make sure to address the handling of many-to-many relationships in the serializer to enhance the functionality of your code. Keep up the great work, and continue to learn from these experiences! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Comment on lines +32 to +34
fields=[
('id', models.BigAutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),
('name', models.CharField(max_length=50)),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Genre model should have a unique constraint on the name field to prevent duplicate entries. You can add unique=True to the CharField definition for name.

Comment on lines 60 to 61
def create(self, validated_data):
return Movie.objects.create(**validated_data)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The create method in MovieSerializer should handle the many-to-many relationships for actors and genres. Consider extracting these fields from validated_data, creating the Movie instance without them, and then using the set() method to add them to the instance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants