Solution #1614
Solution #1614
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Your implementation is on the right track, but there are a couple of improvements needed to fully meet the task requirements. Specifically, using the dict.get() method instead of checking for keys directly will help avoid potential errors and make your code cleaner. Additionally, refactoring your loop to use list comprehension will enhance readability and efficiency. Keep up the great work, and with these changes, your code will be even better! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
app/main.py
Outdated
| people_list = [] | ||
| for person_data in people: | ||
| people_list.append(Person(person_data["name"], person_data["age"])) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using a list comprehension to create people_list. This will make the code more concise and align with the checklist recommendation: 'it is recommended to use list comprehension rather than traditional for loops' .
app/main.py
Outdated
| if "wife" in person_data and person_data["wife"]: | ||
| person.wife = Person.people[person_data["wife"]] | ||
| elif "husband" in person_data and person_data["husband"]: | ||
| person.husband = Person.people[person_data["husband"]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Instead of checking for the presence of keys using in and accessing them directly, use the dict.get() method. This approach simplifies the code and avoids potential KeyError exceptions, making it cleaner and more concise .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on implementing the Person class and the create_person_list function! 🎉 Your code meets the task requirements and constraints, and you've effectively used dictionary access and list comprehension. However, there's room for improvement in simplifying the logic for setting the wife and husband attributes. Since you're already using dict.get(), you can directly assign its result to these attributes, as it will return None if the key doesn't exist. This will make your code cleaner and more robust. Keep up the good work, and make sure to address this simplification in future projects to enhance your coding skills further! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| if person_data.get("wife") and person_data["wife"]: | ||
| person.wife = Person.people.get(person_data["wife"]) | ||
| elif person_data.get("husband") and person_data["husband"]: | ||
| person.husband = Person.people.get(person_data["husband"]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for setting the wife and husband attributes is correct, but it could be simplified. Since you're already using dict.get(), you don't need to check person_data['wife'] or person_data['husband'] again. You can directly assign the result of Person.people.get() to person.wife or person.husband, as dict.get() will return None if the key doesn't exist, which is a valid assignment.
No description provided.