-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solution #1650
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Solution #1650
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your hard work on this pull request! While your code is mostly on the right track, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve it. These issues could impact the functionality and reliability of your code:
-
Typographical Error: There's a typo in the method name
add_partner
, where the parameter is namedpertner_name
instead ofpartner_name
. This needs to be corrected to ensure clarity and prevent potential errors. -
Dictionary Access: The current approach of accessing dictionary values using
list(people[index].values())[2]
is not reliable. It assumes that the partner's name is always the third value, which might not hold true if the dictionary structure changes. It's better to use a key to access the partner's name directly to avoid potential issues. -
Use of
setattr
: Usingsetattr
withlist(people[index].keys())[2]
assumes that the partner attribute is always the third key. This approach might not be reliable if the dictionary keys are not ordered or if the structure changes. Consider setting the partner attribute directly using a key.
Please address these issues to ensure your code is robust and meets the task requirements. Keep up the great work, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review
button in the Reviewers tab.
app/main.py
Outdated
Person.people.update({self.name: self}) | ||
|
||
def add_partner(self, pertner_name: str) -> None: | ||
self.partner = Person.people[pertner_name] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a typo in the variable name pertner_name
. It should be partner_name
.
app/main.py
Outdated
for index, obj in enumerate(people_list): | ||
partner_name = list(people[index].values())[2] | ||
if partner_name is not None: | ||
partner = Person.people[list(people[index].values())[2]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similar to line 17, accessing the partner's name using list(people[index].values())[2]
is not reliable. Consider using a key to access the partner's name directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great job on your submission! 🎉 Your code in app/main.py
meets most of the task requirements, and it's clear you've put in a lot of effort. However, there are a few areas where improvements can be made:
-
Dictionary Access: To prevent
KeyError
exceptions, consider using thedict.get()
method for safer dictionary key access. -
List Comprehension: While your current use of a
for
loop works, using list comprehension can make your code more concise and efficient. -
Use of
setattr
anddelattr
: Directly setting attributes without usingsetattr
anddelattr
can simplify your code and reduce potential errors. -
Partner Attribute Handling: Ensure that the partner's name exists in
Person.people
before accessing it to avoidKeyError
exceptions.
These adjustments will enhance the robustness and readability of your code. Remember, addressing these issues will not only improve this project but also strengthen your coding skills for future tasks. Keep up the great work, and continue learning from each experience! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
self.age = age | ||
Person.people.update({self.name: self}) | ||
|
||
def add_partner(self, partner_name: str) -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The add_partner
method is correctly defined here, but ensure that the partner's name exists in Person.people
before accessing it to avoid potential KeyError
exceptions.
if person["wife"] is not None: | ||
new_obj.wife = person["wife"] | ||
except (KeyError, AttributeError): | ||
if person["husband"] is not None: | ||
new_obj.husband = person["husband"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current logic assumes that a person can have either a 'wife' or a 'husband' attribute. However, if both keys are missing, this will raise a KeyError
. Consider using get
method to safely access dictionary keys without raising exceptions.
partner = Person.people[obj.wife] | ||
delattr(obj, "wife") | ||
setattr(obj, "wife", partner) | ||
except (KeyError, AttributeError): | ||
try: | ||
partner = Person.people[obj.husband] | ||
delattr(obj, "husband") | ||
setattr(obj, "husband", partner) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The use of delattr
and setattr
is unnecessary here. You can directly assign the partner object to the attribute without deleting it first. This will simplify the code and reduce potential errors.
No description provided.