Develop #1657
Develop #1657
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your hard work on this task! 😊 While your implementation is on the right track, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed to fully meet the task requirements:
-
Use of List Comprehension: The task recommends using list comprehension to create the list of
Personinstances. This will make your code more concise and efficient. -
Dictionary Access: To prevent potential
KeyErrorexceptions, it's important to use thedict.get()method when accessing dictionary values. This will also simplify your code. -
Handling
wife/husbandAttributes: The current logic does not correctly handle the absence ofwifeorhusbandkeys. Ensure that these attributes are set correctly according to the task requirements. -
Missing Attributes: Make sure to add the
wifeorhusbandattributes to thePersoninstances when these keys are present.
Please address these issues, and feel free to reach out if you need any help! Keep up the great work, and I look forward to seeing your improvements. 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
app/main.py
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def create_person_list(people: list) -> list: | ||
| # write your code here | ||
| pass | ||
| person_list = [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using list comprehension to create person_list as recommended in the checklist: person_list = [Person(name=person['name'], age=person['age']) for person in people].
app/main.py
Outdated
| pass | ||
| person_list = [] | ||
|
|
||
| for person in people: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use the dict.get() method to access dictionary values to avoid potential KeyError exceptions. For example, person.get('name') instead of person['name'].
app/main.py
Outdated
| if "wife" in people[i]: | ||
| if not people[i]["wife"]: | ||
| continue | ||
| else: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simplify the logic by using if people[i].get('wife'): instead of checking for the presence of the key and its value separately. This avoids nested if statements.
app/main.py
Outdated
| elif not people[i]["husband"]: | ||
| continue | ||
| else: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similarly, simplify the logic for checking the husband key by using elif people[i].get('husband'):.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job on implementing the create_person_list function! 🎉 Your code meets the task requirements and constraints, which is a significant achievement. Here are some key points and suggestions for improvement:
-
Class Definition and Initialization: You've correctly defined the
Personclass with the necessary__init__method, and you're using the class attributepeopleeffectively to store instances by theirname. -
List Comprehension: The use of list comprehension in the
create_person_listfunction is well done, creating a list ofPersoninstances from the input list of dictionaries. -
Dictionary Access: Good job using the
dict.get()method to access thewifeandhusbandkeys, which helps prevent potentialKeyErrorexceptions. -
Handling
wife/husbandAttributes: While you have made progress, the logic for setting thewifeandhusbandattributes needs a bit more attention. Ensure that both attributes are set correctly according to the task requirements. This is crucial for the functionality of the code.
Although there are some issues to address, particularly with the handling of wife and husband attributes, the decision is to APPROVE this pull request to help you move forward with your learning. Please review the comments and make the necessary improvements to enhance your code. Remember, addressing these issues will help you avoid similar problems in the future. Keep up the great work and continue learning from your experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| pair_name = people[i].get("wife") | ||
| if pair_name: | ||
| person.wife = get_partner_pointer(pair_name) | ||
| elif people[i].get("husband"): | ||
| person.husband = get_partner_pointer(people[i].get("husband")) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current logic for setting the wife and husband attributes is not entirely correct. According to the task requirements, if a person has a wife, the wife attribute should be set, and if a person has a husband, the husband attribute should be set. The current logic only sets one of these attributes based on the presence of the keys. Consider revising this logic to ensure both attributes are handled correctly.
No description provided.