Specref is an open-source, community-maintained database of Web standards & related references.
The API to the service is very simple. It supports three operations which are:
GET https://api.specref.org/bibrefs?refs=FileAPI,rfc2119
parameters:
refs=comma-separated,list,of,reference,IDs
callback=nameOfCallbackFunction
returns: a JSON object indexed by IDs
{
"FileAPI": {
"authors": [
"Arun Ranganathan",
"Jonas Sicking"
],
"date": "12 September 2013",
"deliveredBy": [
{
"shortname": "webapps",
"url": "http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/"
}
],
"edDraft": "http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/",
"href": "http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/",
"id": "FileAPI",
"publisher": "W3C",
"status": "LCWD",
"title": "File API"
},
"rfc2119": {
"authors": [
"S. Bradner"
],
"date": "March 1997",
"href": "http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt",
"id": "rfc2119",
"publisher": "IETF",
"status": "Best Current Practice",
"title": "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels"
}
}GET https://api.specref.org/search-refs?q=coffee
parameters:
q=search%20term
callback=nameOfCallbackFunction
returns: a JSON object indexed by IDs
{
"rfc2324": {
"authors": [
"L. Masinter"
],
"date": "1 April 1998",
"href": "http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2324.txt",
"id": "rfc2324",
"publisher": "IETF",
"status": "Informational",
"title": "Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (HTCPCP/1.0)"
},
"rfc7168": {
"authors": [
"I. Nazar"
],
"date": "1 April 2014",
"href": "http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7168.txt",
"id": "rfc7168",
"publisher": "IETF",
"status": "Informational",
"title": "The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)"
}
}Used to get a set of bibliographic references that include the search term in any of their attributes. This is usefull to find specs related to a given area of study, specs by a given editor, etc.
GET https://api.specref.org/reverse-lookup?urls=http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-FileAPI-20121025/
parameters:
urls=comma-separated,list,of,reference,URLs.
callback=nameOfCallbackFunction
returns: a JSON object indexed by URLs
{
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-FileAPI-20121025/": {
"authors": [
"Arun Ranganathan",
"Jonas Sicking"
],
"date": "12 September 2013",
"deliveredBy": [
{
"shortname": "webapps",
"url": "http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/"
}
],
"edDraft": "http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/",
"href": "http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/",
"id": "FileAPI",
"publisher": "W3C",
"status": "LCWD",
"title": "File API"
}
}Notice this finds you the canonical version of a spec and not the precise version the URL points to. This is by design.
Because of legacy references, case sensivity issues and taste, many entries have multiple identifiers. Thus an aliasing system was put in place. It isn't that complicated really: an identifier either points directly to the reference object or to another identifier (through the aliasOf property), recursively. All aliases are resolved (there are tests for that) and when you query the API for a reference you always get all the objects necessary to resolve it in the same response. So for example, https://api.specref.org/bibrefs?refs=rfc7230 responds with:
{
"rfc7230": {
"authors": [
"R. Fielding, Ed.",
"J. Reschke, Ed."
],
"date": "June 2014",
"href": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230",
"id": "rfc7230",
"publisher": "IETF",
"status": "Proposed Standard",
"title": "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing"
}
}while https://api.specref.org/bibrefs?refs=HTTP11 gives you:
{
"HTTP11": {
"aliasOf": "RFC7230",
"id": "HTTP11"
},
"RFC7230": {
"aliasOf": "rfc7230",
"id": "RFC7230"
},
"rfc7230": {
"authors": [
"R. Fielding, Ed.",
"J. Reschke, Ed."
],
"date": "June 2014",
"href": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230",
"id": "rfc7230",
"publisher": "IETF",
"status": "Proposed Standard",
"title": "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing"
}
}Which let's you get to the data by using a simple while loop over the response. The contract guaranteed by the API is to always let you resolve aliases.
Now whether you decide to display the result as [HTTP1], [rfc7230], [RFC7230], or even [1] is up to you. Of course, it's silly to reference both [HTTP1] and [rfc7230] in the same specification, but that's something for the editors and/or their tools to avoid.
Some entries have an obsoletedBy property which contains an array of identifiers.
These identifiers reference specifications that replace this one and can be queried separately from the database.
Like aliases, these identifiers are resolved (there are tests for that), but, unlike aliases, they are not returned with the response to the initial query.
Note that these identifiers can themselves point to aliases or have their own obsoletedBy property, recursively.
CORS is enabled for all origins. By default the service returns JSON data, which is great but not convenient for browsers that do not support CORS yet. For those, simply adding the callback parameter with the name of the callback function you want will switch the response to JSON-P.
Some examples should help:
// get references for SVG, REX, and DAHUT
GET https://api.specref.org/bibrefs?refs=SVG,REX,DAHUT
// the same as JSON-P
GET https://api.specref.org/bibrefs?refs=SVG,REX,DAHUT&callback=yourFunctionName
If you need to find a reference ID (for either bibliographic or cross-references) you need to look for it on specref.org.
Specref loosely follows the process described in The Pull Request Hack. Contributors are generally granted commit access to the repo after their first pull request is sucessfully merged.
It's expected contributors read-up on how to make manual changes and follow the review policy described below.
The review policy has three key principles:
- Get non-trivial changes reviewed by someone.
- You can merge trivial changes yourself, but allow enough time for others to comment on them before you do.
- Never merge a pull request unless travis is green.
We trust contributors to be a good judge of what is trivial, what isn't, and how long to wait before merging a trivial fix. Generally, the more trivial the fix, the shorter the wait.
Similalry, the more a commit message explains the why of a slightly unexpected fix, the less it requires a review.
For example, for a fix that changes an existing HTTPS url to an HTTP one:
Updating URL.
There now exists a Persistent URI Registry of EU Institutions and Bodies[1]
which is to be used when referencing such documents.
Unfortuntaly it doesn't use HTTPS yet.
[1]: http://data.europa.eu/
There are scripts that pull fresh data from IETF, W3C, and WHATWG, and update their relevant files in the refs directory. These are now run hourly. Their output is tested, comitted and deployed without human intervention. Content should now always be up to date.
Generally, manual changes should be limited to the refs/biblio.json file.
If you have commit rights, please don't commit to master directly. Commit to a seperate branch (preferably to your fork) and send a pull request.
All changes are automatically tested using travis and automatically deployed within minutes if all tests pass. You can check that your changes have been properly deployed on www.specref.org, @-mention @tobie in a pull request comment if they haven't.
You can run the tests locally by installing node.js, project dependencies (by running $ npm install from the root of the repository) and running $ npm test. The test suite is quite large and can take a few minutes to run.
Some rules to observe when editing the refs/biblio.json file:
- Don't remove entries unless you are 100% certain that no one is using it. Typically that only applies to cases in which you have just added a reference and want to remove it.
- Don't duplicate entries. Make sure that what you want to add is not in the DB. If it is, add an alias.
- Please use structured objects instead of raw strings.
- Always favor HTTPS URLs.
- The format for structured objects is described in JSON-schema. The schema is used to test new entries, so you better abide by it. :) (Note I'm still looking for a tool to turn the JSON schema into something more easily consumed by human beings. Let me know if you have an idea, or better yet, send a pull request.)
- When you want to update an existing reference, if you see that it uses the old string style, please convert it to a structured object. Edit both
refs/biblio.jsonandrefs/legacy.jsonin the same pull request, or you won't pass validation. - References in this database are expected to be to the “latest and greatest” version of a given specification. In some cases this may be the draft residing in the editor's repository, or it may be the latest snapshot as published by a Working Group into TR — this choice is left to your appreciation. If you really, really want to have a reference to a dated version, then use the
versionsproperty like so:
{
"REFID": {
"versions": {
"YYYYMMDD": {
"href": "http://..."
}
}
}, //...
}- Specref Reference Database (all files in refs/): CC0 1.0 Universal
- Code (all other files): Apache License Version 2.0