fix: 🩹 "++i" statement is not so bad

In some cases, postfix increment may be intentional.

Closes #4

src/main/java/fr/greencodeinitiative/java/checks/IncrementCheck.java

@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
 import java.util.Collections;
 import java.util.List;
 
+import org.sonar.api.utils.log.Logger;
+import org.sonar.api.utils.log.Loggers;
 import org.sonar.check.Rule;
 import org.sonar.plugins.java.api.IssuableSubscriptionVisitor;
 import org.sonar.plugins.java.api.tree.Tree;
@@ -31,14 +33,17 @@
 public class IncrementCheck extends IssuableSubscriptionVisitor {
 
     protected static final String MESSAGERULE = "Use ++i instead of i++";
+    private static final Logger LOGGER = Loggers.get(IncrementCheck.class);
 
     @Override
     public List<Kind> nodesToVisit() {
         return Collections.singletonList(Kind.POSTFIX_INCREMENT);
     }
-
     @Override
     public void visitNode(Tree tree) {
-        reportIssue(tree, MESSAGERULE);
+        LOGGER.debug("Parent node is of Kind: " + tree.parent().toString());
+        if (!tree.parent().is(Kind.ARGUMENTS)) {
+            reportIssue(tree, MESSAGERULE);
+        }   
     }
 }

src/test/files/IncrementCheck.java

@@ -60,4 +60,10 @@ void foo51(int value) {
             System.out.println(i);
         }
     }
+
+    // Compliant because maybe foo51 needs the incremented value
+    void foo6(int value) {
+        int i = 0;
+        foo51(i++);
+    }
 }