Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#57: re-factor to make it easy to deploy and support other web technologies. #64

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

kern3020
Copy link

...ies.

  • the displayable module knows how to display figures
  • the deployable module knows how to deploy figures
  • favor os.sep of hardcoding / in path
  • replaced string replace calls with jinja2 template module

…eb technologies.

- the displayable module knows how to display figures
- the deployable module knows how to deploy figures
- favor os.sep of hardcoding / in path
- replaced string replace calls with jinja2 template module
@kern3020
Copy link
Author

Hello Micha,

Good idea! I'll update it.

-jk

@mikedewar
Copy link
Owner

OK So I'm blocking the merge of this because it makes idiom changes, and it's the idioms that I'm hoping to maintain over the various changes this library will go through before it becomes useful.

The first is the loss of the 'with' idiom - why has that been removed?

The other is the util.display replacing fig.show(). I'm totally happy having additional display options in a util module, and I'm even happy having a discussion about the default show() method, but I'm less happy that the user has to import a separate module and make a decision about how to show the figure.

Would it be possible to get the above additions into a place that doesn't involve any changes to the standard examples? Then, to demonstrate this pull requests additions, new examples could be added?

@kern3020
Copy link
Author

kern3020 commented Apr 5, 2013

Hello Mike,

Thanks for your feedback. I'll follow up in the original bug #57.

-jk

@kern3020
Copy link
Author

Hello Mike,

I've completed the revisions we spoke about. Please have a look at it when you get a chance.

-jk

@mikedewar
Copy link
Owner

I'm so sorry about the delay with this pull request. We've merged in a pull request that incorporates Vega https://github.com/trifacta/vega that completely replaces the javascript generation. We need to do a pass over the new codebase to remove the old javascript generation stuff and then we will get to working out the conflicts newly present in this request!

@kern3020
Copy link
Author

kern3020 commented May 1, 2013

Hello Mike,

No worries. Let me know when the Vega merge is complete.

-jk

@mikedewar mikedewar closed this Mar 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants