Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MatcherClass support for complex matching #52

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

grosmar
Copy link

@grosmar grosmar commented Jan 21, 2016

Hi,

I've extended your Matcher enum with a new type: matcherClass

This way you can provide classes instead of just functions.

Also created a MatcherClass typedef for it, so the system is independent from any concrete implementation.

I did it to use hamcrest for argument checking, this way i call use all the crazy hamcrest Matchers for checking the conditions.

The usage is pretty simple after:
someMock.someFunction(cast matcherClass(endsWith("Bar")));

And as an addition I've removed the warning, if there is no munit defined, because it works with any test runner that is based on annotations. (like hexUnit https://github.com/DoclerLabs/hexUnit).

I want to modify later the macro to be able to receive configuration for the annotation and field names from outside.

I hope you like the modification.

Cheers,
Balazs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant