Don't use the name SCONEPRO

[mirjak]

I think it's better to just talk about a new QUIC version and to not make people believe this is the one and only proposal for a new protocol.

[mjoras]

@mirjak are you okay with the draft name having SCONEPRO? Fwiw I also think if any of this is taken up as a WG the entire name is up for re litigation

[mirjak]

I think you need to have sconepro in the draft name to make sure the datatracker correctly show it with the BoF. I agree this might anyway chance with a wg but for now we need to use the BoF name. We can easily rename after the BoF if people want to continue to work on this draft.

[mirjak]

As a side note, I extended the PR now to also cover the second part of the doc (sorry stopped reading to early).

[mjoras]

@mirjak can you fix the lint the check is mad about (line wrapping I think?) then I can merge.

[mirjak]

Done but note this is a PR on there alternative md Marcus provided on Friday