-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: Don't run QNS when a PR is merged #2161
Conversation
Also don't run it on a schedule anymore.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2161 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.39% 95.38% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 112 112
Lines 36373 36373
==========================================
- Hits 34697 34696 -1
- Misses 1676 1677 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Failed Interop TestsQUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server neqo-latest as client
neqo-latest as server
All resultsSucceeded Interop TestsQUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server neqo-latest as client
neqo-latest as server
Unsupported Interop TestsQUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server neqo-latest as client
neqo-latest as server
|
Benchmark resultsPerformance differences relative to 5677bd1. coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [98.591 ns 98.894 ns 99.212 ns] change: [-0.3848% +0.0637% +0.5182%] (p = 0.78 > 0.05) coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [116.42 ns 116.65 ns 116.91 ns] change: [-0.2102% +0.1014% +0.4298%] (p = 0.54 > 0.05) coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [116.02 ns 116.37 ns 116.81 ns] change: [-0.5855% -0.2218% +0.0999%] (p = 0.22 > 0.05) coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [97.029 ns 97.152 ns 97.290 ns] change: [-1.7601% -0.7178% +0.2105%] (p = 0.19 > 0.05) RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame(): Change within noise threshold.time: [111.93 ms 111.99 ms 112.06 ms] change: [+0.6444% +0.7286% +0.8087%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds: No change in performance detected.time: [26.670 ms 27.713 ms 28.767 ms] change: [-1.7805% +3.1823% +8.2352%] (p = 0.22 > 0.05) transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds: 💔 Performance has regressed.time: [37.317 ms 39.120 ms 40.945 ms] change: [+4.0937% +11.492% +19.058%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) transfer/pacing-false/same-seed: Change within noise threshold.time: [27.110 ms 27.881 ms 28.672 ms] change: [+2.1107% +6.1447% +10.958%] (p = 0.01 < 0.05) transfer/pacing-true/same-seed: Change within noise threshold.time: [42.846 ms 44.882 ms 46.974 ms] change: [+0.5146% +7.4912% +14.984%] (p = 0.03 < 0.05) 1-conn/1-100mb-resp (aka. Download)/client: 💔 Performance has regressed.time: [115.35 ms 115.79 ms 116.21 ms] thrpt: [860.51 MiB/s 863.62 MiB/s 866.91 MiB/s] change: time: [+1.2680% +1.7475% +2.2566%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) thrpt: [-2.2068% -1.7175% -1.2521%] 1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp (aka. RPS)/client: No change in performance detected.time: [317.83 ms 321.27 ms 324.69 ms] thrpt: [30.799 Kelem/s 31.126 Kelem/s 31.464 Kelem/s] change: time: [-0.3420% +1.2784% +2.7536%] (p = 0.12 > 0.05) thrpt: [-2.6798% -1.2623% +0.3432%] 1-conn/1-1b-resp (aka. HPS)/client: No change in performance detected.time: [33.986 ms 34.205 ms 34.451 ms] thrpt: [29.027 elem/s 29.236 elem/s 29.424 elem/s] change: time: [-0.6219% +0.1458% +0.9559%] (p = 0.72 > 0.05) thrpt: [-0.9469% -0.1456% +0.6258%] Client/server transfer resultsTransfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fine with not running on closed pr and scheduled, but wonder whether we should keep push
.
Also don't run it on a schedule anymore.