Move management interface to its own package

[raksooo]

This PR moves the gRPC code generation for the management interface into its own npm package. This makes the file structure, build process and usage cleaner and easier to follow.

---

This change is 

[linear]

DES-1587 Move generated gRPC code to separate package

[MarkusPettersson98]

So nice!! 🔥 🙌

Reviewed 13 of 13 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved

---

desktop/packages/management-interface/package.json line 6 at r1 (raw file):

  "author": "Mullvad VPN",
  "license": "GPL-3.0",
  "description": "",

⛏️ Could we add a quick description of this module? The mullvad-management-interface crate has the following description

Mullvad VPN IPC. Contains types and functions for IPC clients and servers.

Maybe we could write something similar here? 😊

Code quote:

"description": "",

[raksooo]

Reviewable status: 12 of 13 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @MarkusPettersson98)

---

desktop/packages/management-interface/package.json line 6 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, MarkusPettersson98 (Markus Pettersson) wrote…

⛏️ Could we add a quick description of this module? The mullvad-management-interface crate has the following description

Mullvad VPN IPC. Contains types and functions for IPC clients and servers.

Maybe we could write something similar here? 😊

Done.

[MarkusPettersson98]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved

[olmoh]

Great job! 🔥

Reviewed 12 of 13 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @raksooo)

---

desktop/packages/management-interface/src/index.ts line 1 at r2 (raw file):

export * from '../dist/management_interface_grpc_pb';

"Exporting from dist feels a bit unusual. An alternative would be to keep the generated files checked into source so they can be referenced directly. However, from what I understand other parts of the repo follow this pattern, and if so I think we should keep it consistent.

[MarkusPettersson98]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @raksooo)

[raksooo]

I had to make some changes to packages/management-interface/package.json to make it all work on Windows.

Reviewable status: 12 of 13 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @MarkusPettersson98 and @olmoh)

[MarkusPettersson98]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r4, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @raksooo)