Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/mmsf validator #301
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Feature/mmsf validator #301
Changes from 1 commit
39eb75b
06ddd33
78fc824
73b9f35
9386709
73f1b41
2ac5533
7e9fd46
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't realise this before but this is actually a bit more involved, because we're editing _allowed_transitions on the fly. So this will also enable e.g. NONE -> S if F_INIT and O_I have no ports. That's what we want, but not immediately obvious. Maybe this comment could be extended to point out that it's transitive to avoid future confusion?
Also, in that case, will we end up with None -> O_I in _allowed_transitions, despite O_I not having connected ports? That's probably not a problem, since that transition cannot occur anyway?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, will do
Correct, and it is deliberately so. Users can still send on an O_I port when it is not connected (the Communicator will just discard the message). For the MMSFValidator this transition still happens and is valid :)