Serialized storage cache

[shargon]

Description

Close #3145
Alternative to #3146

| Method       | Mean      | Error     | StdDev    |
|------------- |----------:|----------:|----------:|
| WithCache    |  40.66 us |  0.130 us |  0.115 us |
| WithoutCache | 810.69 us | 15.792 us | 13.999 us |

Type of change

• Optimization (the change is only an optimization)
• Style (the change is only a code style for better maintenance or standard purpose)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

• Pending

Test Configuration:

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

[AnnaShaleva]

Good, it should work this way. But I'd suggest to process existing chains with this change in order to ensure that cache persisting logic works as expected.

[nan01ab]

Why comment out these lines?

[shargon]

Usually we run only one benchmark, isn't it?

[Jim8y]

@shargon conflict please

[shargon]

@cschuchardt88 Failed to unzip file "obj/libleveldb-win-arm64.zip" because the file does not exist or is inaccessible. [TargetFramework=net9.0]
0 Warning(s)

[nan01ab]

LGTM

[cschuchardt88]

@cschuchardt88 Failed to unzip file "obj/libleveldb-win-arm64.zip" because the file does not exist or is inaccessible. [TargetFramework=net9.0] 0 Warning(s)

@shargon
Sounds like a dotnet issue or problem with github vm. I'm still testing solutions.