Update comments WRT Qt ≥ 5.9

[Olf0]

No description provided.

[nephros]

Actually I think I merged this too quickly - it does not really fit the purpose of the feature branch (which is to deal with storeman-developers#301).

I have cherry-picked these and pushed to a new branch https://github.com/nephros/harbour-storeman/tree/todo-qt and will rebase, drop and forcepush the rename-service branch.

If we decide to actually release the sailjail stuff, these can be merged in as well.

[Olf0]

Actually I think I merged this too quickly - it does not really fit the purpose of the feature branch (which is to deal with storeman-developers#301).

True.

I have cherry-picked these and pushed to a new branch https://github.com/nephros/harbour-storeman/tree/todo-qt and will rebase, drop and forcepush the rename-service branch.

Fine.

If we decide to actually release the sailjail stuff, these can be merged in as well.

No, I would like to merge them now, as they resolve two of the many points listed at storeman-developers#356

But, before I also merge this too quickly: Do you see any reason not to merge storeman-developers#357 now?

[nephros]

No, I would like to merge them now, as they resolve two of the many points listed at storeman-developers#356

But, before I also merge this too quickly: Do you see any reason not to merge storeman-developers#357 now?

Not really, no.

[Olf0]

Done.