docs(recipes/nestia): new library and new content

[samchon]

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our guidelines: https://github.com/nestjs/docs.nestjs.com/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• Docs
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

To introduce new library nestia

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Other information

Re-challenge after 6 months. During the 6 months.

Hope my libraries to be helpful for NestJS developers.

[jmcdo29]

Got a couple of changes like removing extra whitespace, and some questions I want answered, but overall it looks good! Excited to find a side project to use this on to see how it goes 😄

[samchon]

Fixed following your advices, but cannot sure how to resolve the "client code".

Would it better to remove the last example code and write like below?:

---

Demonstration

When you run npx nestia sdk command, @nestia/sdk will generate an SDK library interacting with your backend server, composed with codes like below. If you want to learn how to distribute the SDK library, visit and read Guide Documents - Distribution.

import { Fetcher, IConnection } from "@nestia/fetcher";
import { IBbsArticle } from "../../../structures/IBbsArticle";

/**
 * Store a new content.
 * 
 * @param input Content to store
 * @returns Newly archived article
 */
export function store(
    connection: api.IConnection, 
    input: IBbsArticle.IStore
): Promise<IBbsArticle> {
    return Fetcher.fetch(
        connection,
        store.ENCRYPTED,
        store.METHOD,
        store.path(),
        input
    );
}
export namespace store {
    export const METHOD = "POST" as const;
    export function path(): string {
        return "/bbs/articles";
    }
}

[jmcdo29]

Overall addition looks good to me. I'll leave @kamilmysliwiec to review it as well when he has the time.

[samchon]

Erased the last client example code.

Thanks for your guide @jmcdo29

[samchon]

Added a break line after third party package and is not managed by the NestJS core team ~.

[samchon]

Changed guide documents (wiki) link (I'd revised contents of guide documents)

[micalevisk]

@kamilmysliwiec will we bring this to the docs? looks good to me.

We already have that at https://github.com/nestjs/awesome-nestjs

[kamilmysliwiec]

#2656 (comment)

Fantastic job anyway, Nestia looks really impressive!

[samchon]

#2656 (comment)

Fantastic job anyway, Nestia looks really impressive!

@kamilmysliwiec

Well, I have waited your review for one year, and during the year, I had saw lots of other libraries (had committed later than me, even now) are newly added in the recipes section. I can understand why are you saying such like that, but it sounds collapsed for me because of long time waiting.

Hope your mercy.

p.s) if hard to keep recipes section more, it is okay to creating new category and writing this content again to be suitable for the new category