Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: make load dispenser optional #603

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 25, 2023
Merged

feat: make load dispenser optional #603

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 25, 2023

Conversation

eruizgar91
Copy link
Member

@eruizgar91 eruizgar91 commented Oct 25, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Description

Pass testNet as an option, to only load the dispenser and the token contract in the case that the flag is set to true.

Is this PR related with an open issue?

Related to Issue #

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • Follows the code style of this project.
  • Tests Cover Changes
  • Documentation

Funny gif

Put a link of a funny gif inside the parenthesis-->

@eruizgar91 eruizgar91 force-pushed the fix/no-dispenser-no-token branch from 95dfad1 to 6f610b4 Compare October 25, 2023 12:38
@eruizgar91 eruizgar91 marked this pull request as ready for review October 25, 2023 13:01
@eruizgar91 eruizgar91 requested review from a team as code owners October 25, 2023 13:01
@eruizgar91 eruizgar91 merged commit 47823bb into main Oct 25, 2023
3 checks passed
@eruizgar91 eruizgar91 deleted the fix/no-dispenser-no-token branch October 25, 2023 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@r-marques r-marques r-marques approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@eruizgar91 @r-marques