Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve FolderStatusModel tests #7855

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 15 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
37 changes: 19 additions & 18 deletions src/gui/folderstatusmodel.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ void FolderStatusModel::setAccountState(const AccountState *accountState)
}

endResetModel();
// TODO: maybe we need to analyze the previous state of _dirty before signal emitting?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would something needed to do here or not ?
I would prefer not to have comments with TODO that will still be there in 10 years (I am pretty sure we have such comments already)

Copy link
Author

@ArtiomKhachaturian ArtiomKhachaturian Feb 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see my comment below

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is the added value of this comment ?
we do not really want to clutter the code base with comments that will have to be maintained unless they bring value now and likely in the future

emit dirtyChanged();

// Automatically fetch the subfolders to prevent showing the expansion chevron if there are no subfolders
Expand All @@ -114,7 +115,7 @@ void FolderStatusModel::setAccountState(const AccountState *accountState)

Qt::ItemFlags FolderStatusModel::flags(const QModelIndex &index) const
{
if (!_accountState) {
if (!_accountState || !index.isValid()) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be better to use checkIndex

https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qabstractitemmodel.html#checkIndex

Copy link
Author

@ArtiomKhachaturian ArtiomKhachaturian Feb 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe, but I didn't anything about this method, but why is it better? I don't see the advantages in comparing with simple QModelIndex::isValid, according to QT6 sources https://codebrowser.dev/qt6/qtbase/src/corelib/itemmodels/qabstractitemmodel.cpp.html#3590 this method is convenient for complex verification of model index with possible logging, but it's not our case, I'm sure that QModelIndex::isValid is enough for fast index validation

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think @claucambra is referring to the recommended way to test indexes within the model classes from Qt
I am convinced that checkIndex was added for some good reasons

return {};
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -157,10 +158,12 @@ QVariant FolderStatusModel::data(const QModelIndex &index, int role) const
if (role == FolderStatusDelegate::AddButton) {
return true;
} else if (role == Qt::ToolTipRole) {
if (!_accountState->isConnected()) {
return tr("You need to be connected to add a folder");
if (_accountState) {
if (!_accountState->isConnected()) {
return tr("You need to be connected to add a folder");
}
return tr("Click this button to add a folder to synchronize.");
}
return tr("Click this button to add a folder to synchronize.");
}
return {};
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -393,6 +396,8 @@ bool FolderStatusModel::setData(const QModelIndex &index, const QVariant &value,
}
}
}
// TODO: think about that maybe better to introduce a separate setter for [_dirty] var with emitting of signal if changed
// TODO: maybe we need to analyze the previous state of _dirty before signal emitting?
_dirty = true;
emit dirtyChanged();
emit dataChanged(index, index, QVector<int>() << role);
Expand All @@ -416,25 +421,21 @@ int FolderStatusModel::rowCount(const QModelIndex &parent) const
}
return _folders.count() + 1; // +1 for the "add folder" button
}
const auto info = infoForIndex(parent);
if (!info)
return 0;
if (info->hasLabel())
return 1;
return info->_subs.count();
if (const auto info = infoForIndex(parent)) {
return info->hasLabel() ? 1 : info->_subs.count();
}
return 0;
}

FolderStatusModel::ItemType FolderStatusModel::classify(const QModelIndex &index) const
{
if (const auto sub = static_cast<SubFolderInfo *>(index.internalPointer())) {
if (sub->hasLabel()) {
return FetchLabel;
} else {
return SubFolder;
if (index.isValid()) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should use checkIndex

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think checking if it is valid and doing an early return instead would be cleaner

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

disagree, sorry, see my comment above

if (const auto sub = static_cast<const SubFolderInfo *>(index.internalPointer())) {
return sub->hasLabel() ? FetchLabel : SubFolder;
}
if (index.row() < _folders.count()) {
return RootFolder;
}
}
if (index.row() < _folders.count()) {
return RootFolder;
}
return AddButton;
}
Expand Down
159 changes: 142 additions & 17 deletions test/testfolderstatusmodel.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <QtTest>
#include <QStandardPaths>
#include <QAbstractItemModelTester>
#include <theme.h>

#include "accountstate.h"
#include "folderman.h"
Expand All @@ -29,7 +30,6 @@ using namespace OCC::Utility;
class TestFolderStatusModel : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT

std::unique_ptr<FolderMan> _folderMan;

public:
Expand All @@ -44,8 +44,103 @@ private Q_SLOTS:

_folderMan.reset(new FolderMan{});
}

void testThatFolderManHasInstance() {
QVERIFY2(nullptr != FolderMan::instance(), "folder manager must not be a NULL");
}

void testEmptyModelHasOneColumn()
{
const FolderStatusModel test;
QCOMPARE(test.columnCount(), 1);
}

void testAccountStateIsConnected()
{
const auto fakeFolder = makeFakeFolder();
const FakeAccountState accountState{fakeFolder.account()};
QVERIFY2(accountState.isConnected(), "account must be connected");
}
Comment on lines +58 to +63
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My impression is this test is out of place, we should be verifying the behaviour of this in a test of the FakeFolder/FakeAccountState


void testAbilityToAddRemoveAccountFolders()
{
executeFolderManTest([](const AccountState *accountState, Folder *folder){
QVERIFY2(folder, "folder manager was not able to add folder for a given account");
QCOMPARE(folder->accountState(), accountState);
});
}

void testModelConsistencyWithFakeFolder()
{
executeConsistencyModelTest([](const AccountState *accountState, FolderStatusModel &test) {
test.setAccountState(accountState);
QVERIFY2(!test.isDirty(), "model is dirty after set account state");
});
}

void testNewModelEmitDirtyChangedSignalAfterSetAccountState()
{
executeConsistencyModelTest([](const AccountState *accountState, FolderStatusModel &test) {
const QSignalSpy dirtySignalSpy{&test, &FolderStatusModel::dirtyChanged};
test.setAccountState(accountState);
QCOMPARE(dirtySignalSpy.count(), 1);
});
}

void testModelRowsCount()
{
executeConsistencyModelTest([](const AccountState *accountState, FolderStatusModel &test) {
test.setAccountState(accountState);
// folders count +1 for the "add folder" button if [singleSyncFolder] is true
const auto expectedRowsCount = Theme::instance()->singleSyncFolder() ? 1 : 2;
QCOMPARE(test.rowCount(), expectedRowsCount);
});
}

void testRowsChildrenConsistency()
{
executeConsistencyModelTest([](const AccountState *accountState, FolderStatusModel &test) {
test.setAccountState(accountState);
QVERIFY2(test.hasChildren({}), "empty index always has children");
// we assume that folder may contains of some child elements until not yet fetched
QCOMPARE(test.hasChildren(test.index(0)), !test._folders.front()._fetched);
});
}

void testThatRowClassifyWorksProperly()
{
executeConsistencyModelTest([](const AccountState *accountState, FolderStatusModel &test) {
test.setAccountState(accountState);
QCOMPARE(test.classify({}), FolderStatusModel::ItemType::AddButton);
QCOMPARE(test.classify(test.index(0)), FolderStatusModel::ItemType::RootFolder);
});
}

void testSubFoldersInfoForIndices()
{
executeConsistencyModelTest([](const AccountState *accountState, FolderStatusModel &test) {
test.setAccountState(accountState);
QCOMPARE(test.infoForIndex({}), nullptr);
QVERIFY2(nullptr != test.infoForIndex(test.index(0)), "NULL info for index 0");
});
}

void testThatAppropriateSignalsEmittedIfItemChecked()
{
executeConsistencyModelTest([](const AccountState *accountState, FolderStatusModel &test) {
test.setAccountState(accountState);
// set checked for our single root folder
const QSignalSpy dataChangedSignalSpy{&test, &QAbstractItemModel::dataChanged};
const QSignalSpy dirtySignalSpy{&test, &FolderStatusModel::dirtyChanged};
QVERIFY(test.setData(test.index(0), Qt::CheckState::Checked, Qt::CheckStateRole));
QVERIFY2(dataChangedSignalSpy.count() > 0, "make sure the signal [dataChanged] was emitted at least one time");
QVERIFY2(dirtySignalSpy.count() > 0, "make sure the signal [dirtyChanged] was emitted at least one time");
QVERIFY2(test.isDirty(), "model is not dirty after set checked state for the folder");
});
}

void startModel()
private:
static FakeFolder makeFakeFolder()
{
FakeFolder fakeFolder{FileInfo::A12_B12_C12_S12()};

Expand All @@ -59,21 +154,51 @@ private Q_SLOTS:
account->setCapabilities(capabilities);
account->setCredentials(new FakeCredentials{fakeFolder.networkAccessManager()});
account->setUrl(QUrl(("owncloud://somehost/owncloud")));
auto accountState = FakeAccountState(account);
QVERIFY(accountState.isConnected());

auto folderDef = folderDefinition(fakeFolder.localPath());
folderDef.targetPath = "";
const auto folder = FolderMan::instance()->addFolder(&accountState, folderDef);
QVERIFY(folder);

FolderStatusModel test;
test.setAccountState(&accountState);

QSKIP("Initial test implementation is known to be broken");
QAbstractItemModelTester modeltester(&test);

test.fetchMore({});
return fakeFolder;
}

static OCC::FolderDefinition makeFolderDefinition(const QString &path) {
auto folderDef = folderDefinition(path);
folderDef.targetPath.clear();
return folderDef;
}

static OCC::FolderDefinition makeFolderDefinition(const FakeFolder &folder) {
return makeFolderDefinition(folder.localPath());
}

template <typename TestFunctor>
static void executeFolderManTest(TestFunctor&& functor)
{
const auto fakeFolder = makeFakeFolder();
const AccountStatePtr accountState{new FakeAccountState{fakeFolder.account()}};
const auto folder = FolderMan::instance()->addFolder(accountState.get(),
makeFolderDefinition(fakeFolder));
try {
functor(accountState.get(), folder);
// cleanup
if (folder) {
FolderMan::instance()->removeFolder(folder);
}
}
catch(...) {
// cleanup
if (folder) {
FolderMan::instance()->removeFolder(folder);
}
throw; // rethrow exception from test framework
}
}

template <typename TestFunctor>
static void executeConsistencyModelTest(TestFunctor&& functor)
{
executeFolderManTest([functor](const AccountState *accountState, Folder*){
FolderStatusModel test;
QAbstractItemModelTester tester{&test, QAbstractItemModelTester::FailureReportingMode::QtTest};
tester.setUseFetchMore(true);
functor(accountState, test);
});
}
};

Expand Down