Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GNSS functions to gnss_utils and reuse filtered gnss data #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2024

Conversation

rzinke
Copy link
Contributor

@rzinke rzinke commented Sep 7, 2024

Changes:
solid_utils

  • new module for storing gnss handling/postprocessing functions: gnss_utils.py

Secular_Requirement_Validation.ipynb
Environmental Setup
Load Python Packages

  • import statement for solid_utils.gnss_utils functions
    4.5 Estimate GNSS LOS Velocities
  • added text describing function fit and outlier removal
  • moved functions for GNSS handling to new module: solid_utils/gnss_utils.py
  • store filtered (outlier-removed) GNSS displacement data in dict for later (section A.4)
  • made outliers red in plots
    A.4 GNSS Timeseries Plots
  • use outlier-removed data from section 4.5 in plots

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link
Collaborator

@EJFielding EJFielding left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great improvement to separate the functions, and also plot the GNSS with offsets removed

@EJFielding EJFielding merged commit efad292 into main Sep 7, 2024
1 check passed
katia-tymofyeyeva added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
* GNSS source and outlier removal updates (#59)

Co-authored-by: rzinke <[email protected]>

* GNSS functions to gnss_utils and reuse filtered gnss data (#60)

Co-authored-by: rzinke <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: rzinke <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: rzinke <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants