-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Wait for #2803][Mixed Precision] Fix gradient clipping logic @open sesame 12/02 09:37 #2749
[Wait for #2803][Mixed Precision] Fix gradient clipping logic @open sesame 12/02 09:37 #2749
Conversation
📝 TAOS-CI Version: 1.5.20200925. Thank you for submitting PR #2749. Please a submit 1commit/1PR (one commit per one PR) policy to get comments quickly from reviewers. Your PR must pass all verificiation processes of cibot before starting a review process from reviewers. If you are new member to join this project, please read manuals in documentation folder and wiki page. In order to monitor a progress status of your PR in more detail, visit http://ci.nnstreamer.ai/. |
cibot: @DonghakPark, A builder checker could not be completed because one of the checkers is not completed. In order to find out a reason, please go to http://ci.nnstreamer.ai/nntrainer/ci/repo-workers/pr-checker/2749-202410081648530.3276469707489-2d4e34793f8bee4d6bcada6961a4d3345e7e8d56/. |
2d4e347
to
cd67fd0
Compare
cd67fd0
to
2a41677
Compare
cibot: @DonghakPark, A builder checker could not be completed because one of the checkers is not completed. In order to find out a reason, please go to http://ci.nnstreamer.ai/nntrainer/ci/repo-workers/pr-checker/2749-202411251023080.00036811828613281-2a4167753060e51f0e04d20b8a66a6611ada5977/. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DonghakPark, 💯 All CI checkers are successfully verified. Thanks.
10cae11
to
fba7c09
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this about gradient "clipping"..? or just loss scaling
This PR about "loss scaling" at gradient clipping logic in case Mixed Precision |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DonghakPark, 💯 All CI checkers are successfully verified. Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DonghakPark, 💯 All CI checkers are successfully verified. Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DonghakPark, 💯 All CI checkers are successfully verified. Thanks.
update mixed precision - gradient clipping logic - when gradient clipping, gradient should unscale before calc l2norm **Self evaluation:** 1. Build test: [X]Passed [ ]Failed [ ]Skipped 2. Run test: [X]Passed [ ]Failed [ ]Skipped Signed-off-by: Donghak PARK <[email protected]>
30d3abc
to
12ebb99
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DonghakPark, 💯 All CI checkers are successfully verified. Thanks.
[Mixed Precision] Fix gradient clipping logic
update mixed precision - gradient clipping logic
Resolves:
Self evaluation:
Signed-off-by: Donghak PARK [email protected]