Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adds VLLM_EXTRACTION to usage protos #2802

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

Ciniesta
Copy link
Contributor

Description

adds VLLM_EXTRACTION to usage protos

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.21%. Comparing base (71ed76b) to head (b1274cc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2802      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.16%   87.21%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         389      389              
  Lines       24557    24557              
==========================================
+ Hits        21404    21418      +14     
+ Misses       3153     3139      -14     
Flag Coverage Δ
nucliadb 74.93% <ø> (+0.08%) ⬆️
nucliadb-ingest 40.63% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb-reader 43.04% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb-search 44.24% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
nucliadb-standalone 47.80% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb-train 45.89% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb-writer 46.35% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb_dataset 55.45% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb_models 85.73% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb_sdk 80.11% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb_sidecar 89.03% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb_telemetry 86.56% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb_utils 83.79% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Ciniesta Ciniesta merged commit 7d5e6ee into main Jan 23, 2025
56 checks passed
@Ciniesta Ciniesta deleted the add-VLLM_EXTRACTION-to-usage-protos branch January 23, 2025 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants