-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Raise and reraise exceptions with Stdlib rather than Lwt #188
Conversation
94d8372
to
ae18e09
Compare
ae18e09
to
2639416
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems reasonable.
1109de1
to
771a198
Compare
Lwt's documentation reads: > In most cases, it is better to use `failwith s` from the standard > library. and > Whenever possible, it is recommended to use `raise exn` instead, as > raise captures a backtrace, while `Lwt.fail` does not. If you call > `raise exn` in a callback that is expected by Lwt to return a > promise, Lwt will automatically wrap `exn` in a rejected promise, > but the backtrace will have been recorded by the OCaml runtime. > > For example, `bind`'s second argument is a callback which returns a > promise. And so it is recommended to use `raise` in the body of that > callback. > > Use `Lwt.fail` only when you specifically want to create a rejected > promise, to pass to another function, or store in a data structure. Prefer to capture backtraces to improve debugability.
771a198
to
1ab3ba6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is good to go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. The Unix.ENOENT
error from CI is also affecting the main branch, so not due to this PR.
@shonfeder I can't merge this because of the new rules preventing merges if the CI doesn't pass. |
The system works! :D Tho unfortunately the CI failures here are just #186. |
Thanks again for this fix :D |
Lwt's documentation reads:
and
Prefer to capture backtraces to improve debugability.
See also ocsigen/lwt#1008.