Benchmarks: new PyPSA benchmarks with missing features #91
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, Daniele. As discussed, I'm moving the changes to benchmark_config.yaml from #93 to here.
Closed
siddharth-krishna
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2025
siddharth-krishna
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi @siddharth-krishna I added 3 new PyPSA benchmarks to cover the missing features in the single node capacity expansion small benchmarks. So we have a new small problem with the addition of a battery storage for electricity, one with an emission limit and one with battery storage and unit commitment on the gas generator (so 2 LPs and 1 MILP). I also wanted to add CCS and retrofits among the technological options but the current technology-data repo does not contain data to include them in the power model. It may be considered as a possible future update.
I also modified the
only_generate_problem_fileoption inkeep_filesto get .lp files as the latest linopy version doesn't allow its use anymore (I actually don't remember if you used a customized solution for not solving the problem but just getting the .lp file, but I checked the possible options for then.optimizefunction andonly_generate_prolem_fileis not there).I didn't add the size statistics as we were mentioning about using a JuMP-Highs tool for getting them.