-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[processorhelper] report signal as attribute on incoming/outgoing items #11144
[processorhelper] report signal as attribute on incoming/outgoing items #11144
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11144 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.29% 92.28% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 413 413
Lines 19792 19760 -32
==========================================
- Hits 18268 18236 -32
Misses 1152 1152
Partials 372 372 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please rebase & resolve merge conflicts
This updating the existing metric points that were recently added to use signal as an attribute instead of separating the metric name. It follows the suggestions in otep 259 for the metric and attribute names. Signed-off-by: Alex Boten <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Boten <[email protected]>
7f93a32
to
fbdb5ca
Compare
This updating the existing metric points that were recently added to use signal as an attribute instead of separating the metric name. It follows the suggestions in otep 259 for the metric and attribute names.
Putting this in draft to get some feedback from @djaglowski before moving forward with this change