[chore] Use gotestsum wrapper for go tests #11946
Merged
+63
−7
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11946 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.62% 91.62%
=======================================
Files 447 447
Lines 23729 23729
=======================================
Hits 21741 21741
Misses 1613 1613
Partials 375 375 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
mx-psi
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2024
codeboten
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
Use gotestyourself/gotestsum for running tests.
This is following contrib's lead - they implemented this in this PR.
Gotestsum is a lot more readable and user friendly than go test - the output format is nicer and the test output is more parseable. We could also use rerun on failed or some of their other features!