Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: ensure pipeline params match ilab defaults #233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

tumido
Copy link
Member

@tumido tumido commented Dec 9, 2024

Resolves #211

Description

Re-align defaults we use in the pipeline with what InstructLab declares as defaults in https://github.com/instructlab/instructlab/blob/main/tests/testdata/default_config.yaml

Each param default now features a reference to the InstructLab default config.

WIP. Some params require additional discussion. I've marked them as FIXME:. These params have no basis in the default config and we should discuss if they need to be surfaced, if they require further justification for its default value or they are good as is. They can totally be good as is, I just wanted to raise awareness about them.

@tumido tumido force-pushed the phase-3-ensure-params branch from f793b94 to 54ab9dd Compare December 9, 2024 14:41
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tumido tumido force-pushed the phase-3-ensure-params branch 2 times, most recently from 1a3b970 to f926bf6 Compare December 9, 2024 15:44
@tumido tumido changed the title wip: chore: ensure pipeline params match ilab defaults chore: ensure pipeline params match ilab defaults Dec 9, 2024
pipeline.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@leseb leseb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to update the README as well?

Copy link
Collaborator

@MichaelClifford MichaelClifford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@tumido tumido force-pushed the phase-3-ensure-params branch from f926bf6 to 9fff4ee Compare December 10, 2024 11:43
@leseb
Copy link
Collaborator

leseb commented Dec 10, 2024

Do we need to update the README as well?

@tumido do we need any changes in https://github.com/opendatahub-io/ilab-on-ocp?tab=readme-ov-file#available-pipeline-parameters?

@tumido
Copy link
Member Author

tumido commented Dec 10, 2024

I don't think so. No param was removed or added, no description has changed... So in regard to the content we already have in the README, no change is required.

However I can extend the README with default values and references, if we want to link it from there as well. 🤷 I don't have a preference there. What would you do @leseb ? 🙂 @MichaelClifford WDYT?

@leseb
Copy link
Collaborator

leseb commented Dec 10, 2024

I don't think so. No param was removed or added, no description has changed... So in regard to the content we already have in the README, no change is required.

However I can extend the README with default values and references, if we want to link it from there as well. 🤷 I don't have a preference there. What would you do @leseb ? 🙂 @MichaelClifford WDYT?

Maybe as a followup if you feel like it. Thanks!

@MichaelClifford
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't think so. No param was removed or added, no description has changed... So in regard to the content we already have in the README, no change is required.

However I can extend the README with default values and references, if we want to link it from there as well. 🤷 I don't have a preference there. What would you do @leseb ? 🙂 @MichaelClifford WDYT?

Maybe as a followup if you feel like it. Thanks!

Agree let's do it in a follow up, if at all 😄

@MichaelClifford MichaelClifford merged commit 330b335 into opendatahub-io:main Dec 10, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Re-evaluate default param values for KFP
3 participants