feat: add kustomize manifests for kubeflow, fixes RHOAIENG-1947

[dhirajsb]

Description

Add kustomize manifests for kubeflow
Based on ml-metadata manifests for mlmd in kubeflow pipelines.
Fixes RHOAIENG-1947

How Has This Been Tested?

WIP

Merge criteria:

• The commits and have meaningful messages; the author will squash them after approval or will ask to merge with squash.
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d9144d9) 76.19% compared to head (a61c6ee) 76.19%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #292   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.19%   76.19%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        2033     2033           
  Branches       74       74           
=======================================
  Hits         1549     1549           
  Misses        299      299           
  Partials      185      185           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dhirajsb]

PR is in draft, do NOT merge!

[dhirajsb]

@tarilabs can you approve it so that we can merge it into upstream kubeflow?

[tarilabs]

@tarilabs can you approve it so that we can merge it into upstream kubeflow?

absolutely, thanks for these @dhirajsb, I understand these are manifests to use model-registry in place of Operator (say upstream KF) eventually it will be meaningful to be put under tests but given the urgency this /lgtm and we can work on placing under tests in subsequent PRs.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhirajsb, tarilabs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [dhirajsb,tarilabs]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[tarilabs]

@dhirajsb also for the future don't hesitate to use @opendatahub-io/model-registry-maintainers tags in Review box when needed urgent action we can rely on who's on in the timezone :) hth 👍