Edx abolger/local e2e #63
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
edx-abolger
requested review from
brittneyexline,
jlajoie,
georgebabey and
raq929
edx-abolger
force-pushed
the
edx-abolger/local-e2e
branch
3 times, most recently
from
ec41363 to
ee76dd1
Compare
edx-abolger
force-pushed
the
edx-abolger/local-e2e
branch
from
ee76dd1 to
ceea446
Compare
jlajoie
approved these changes
May 7, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a documentation update and a Proof Of Concept configuration of how Cypress can be run against Devstack. Note that all of the current tests against admin portal run but fail because they have pass conditions associated with staging data.
My hope would be that this PR is accepted with this idea that future work exists to add or change test configurations that would run only with data that is auto-provisioned to devstack via scripts. This would move us toward all (Enterprise at least) developers having a set of e2e tests they could run locally.
@brittneyexline you're on this PR since I noticed E2E tests were a goal point on your Enterprise oncall/monitoring summary project. Let me know if it makes sense to push this any further at this time.