Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: UI improvements #318

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Lunyachek
Copy link
Contributor

@Lunyachek Lunyachek commented Apr 3, 2024

Minor fix for Back to My Records button

First proposal: make the button look the same as the button on the records page

Second proposal: remove the <a> tag from the <button> tag. The current approach is not recommended due to potential accessibility and semantic issues

Снимок экрана 2024-04-04 в 00 59 00

Decrease font size for the Questions about Learner Records title - to match with the same title on Records page

Снимок экрана 2024-04-04 в 01 10 26 Снимок экрана 2024-04-04 в 01 14 52

Send Program Record modal window - checkboxes alignment

Before

Снимок экрана 2024-04-04 в 14 11 01

After

Снимок экрана 2024-04-04 в 14 11 38

@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

openedx-webhooks commented Apr 3, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, @Lunyachek!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @2U-aperture. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Apr 3, 2024
@Lunyachek Lunyachek force-pushed the lunyachek/feat/ui-improvements-master branch from 1802de1 to 75ed23b Compare April 3, 2024 22:20
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.87%. Comparing base (323ea5d) to head (e1accfe).
Report is 31 commits behind head on master.

Current head e1accfe differs from pull request most recent head 0634547

Please upload reports for the commit 0634547 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #318      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.73%   70.87%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          28       28              
  Lines         410      412       +2     
  Branches       87       89       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          290      292       +2     
  Misses        119      119              
  Partials        1        1              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Lunyachek Lunyachek mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2024
- Minor fix for Back to My Records button
- Decrease font size for the Questions about Learner Records title
- Send Program Record modal window - checkboxes alignment
@Lunyachek Lunyachek force-pushed the lunyachek/feat/ui-improvements-master branch from 75ed23b to e1accfe Compare April 4, 2024 11:18
@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 added the waiting for eng review PR is ready for review. Review and merge it, or suggest changes. label Apr 5, 2024
@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 requested a review from a team April 5, 2024 00:39
@mphilbrick211
Copy link

Hi @openedx/2u-aperture! This PR and it's backport are ready for review. Thanks!

@jsnwesson jsnwesson added the needs maintainer attention Issue or PR specifically needs the attention of the maintainer. label Apr 5, 2024
@deborahgu
Copy link
Member

Is this the kind of thing that requires product review (because it's a design change)? And if so, did it get one? (forgive me if I don't understand what needs to go through product review; I'm trying to get a handle on this.)

@deborahgu deborahgu added the waiting on author PR author needs to resolve review requests, answer questions, fix tests, etc. label Apr 10, 2024
@mphilbrick211
Copy link

Is this the kind of thing that requires product review (because it's a design change)? And if so, did it get one? (forgive me if I don't understand what needs to go through product review; I'm trying to get a handle on this.)

@deborahgu I'll check with Product to see!

@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ import { Hyperlink } from '@openedx/paragon';
function RecordsHelp({ helpUrl }) {
return (
<section className="help">
<h2>
<h3 className="h5">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are you switching to a skipped heading level here? The previous heading is h1.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Lunyachek Lunyachek Apr 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did it by analogy with this and this files.

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 removed the waiting for eng review PR is ready for review. Review and merge it, or suggest changes. label May 2, 2024
justinhynes
justinhynes previously approved these changes May 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@justinhynes justinhynes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for the fixes. Once this is approved by @deborahgu, I'll take a look at the backport PR too.

@justinhynes
Copy link
Contributor

@deborahgu Any additional feedback or suggestions here? Are there any other changes you'd like to see?

@deborahgu
Copy link
Member

  1. I'm still uncomfortable with the skipped heading level; following a broken pattern is still broken. I think this needs accessibility review.
  2. @mphilbrick211, does this need product review?

@mphilbrick211
Copy link

Hi @deborahgu and @justinhynes! I checked in again with @jmakowski1123 and she said this should go through Product review. I've added the label and we'll hold for her team to take a look.

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 added product review PR requires product review before merging and removed needs maintainer attention Issue or PR specifically needs the attention of the maintainer. labels May 20, 2024
@justinhynes justinhynes dismissed their stale review May 20, 2024 19:59

Dismissing review until this has gone through Product review.

@deborahgu deborahgu added the needs maintainer attention Issue or PR specifically needs the attention of the maintainer. label Jul 16, 2024
@justinhynes justinhynes removed the needs maintainer attention Issue or PR specifically needs the attention of the maintainer. label Aug 14, 2024
@justinhynes
Copy link
Contributor

I removed the needs maintainer attention only because this appears to have not been through product review. Once that is finished, we can pick it back as maintainers.

@justinhynes
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mphilbrick211 & @jmakowski1123!

Just following up on this since it's been awhile. Did this ever go through Product Review?

@ihor-romaniuk
Copy link

Hello everyone,
It seems our pull request for the fix might be a bit stuck in the review process. Would someone be able to take a look at it when they have a moment?
Thank you so much for your time and help!

@deborahgu
Copy link
Member

This is still awaiting product review (cc @mphilbrick211). And once it's had product review, we're going to require the skipped heading level be addressed for accessibility purposes. Copying broken prior art is still broken.

@mphilbrick211
Copy link

This is still awaiting product review (cc @mphilbrick211). And once it's had product review, we're going to require the skipped heading level be addressed for accessibility purposes. Copying broken prior art is still broken.

@deborahgu @jmakowski1123 does a product roadmap ticket exist for this?

@deborahgu
Copy link
Member

Not as far as I know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U product review PR requires product review before merging waiting on author PR author needs to resolve review requests, answer questions, fix tests, etc.
Projects
Status: Blocked
Status: Product Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants