Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.1 #935

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.1 #935

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 21, 2022 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
react-router (source) 6.15.0 -> 6.28.1 age adoption passing confidence
react-router-dom (source) 6.15.0 -> 6.28.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

remix-run/react-router (react-router)

v6.28.1: v6.28.1

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6281

v6.28.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
    • Log deprecation warnings for v7 flags (#​11750)
    • Add deprecation warnings to json/defer in favor of returning raw objects
      • These methods will be removed in React Router v7
Patch Changes

v6.27.0: v6.27.0

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6270

v6.26.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.26.1

Compare Source

v6.26.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new replace(url, init?) alternative to redirect(url, init?) that performs a history.replaceState instead of a history.pushState on client-side navigation redirects (#​11811)
Patch Changes
  • Fix initial hydration behavior when using future.v7_partialHydration along with unstable_patchRoutesOnMiss (#​11838)
    • During initial hydration, router.state.matches will now include any partial matches so that we can render ancestor HydrateFallback components
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.25.1: v6.25.1

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6251

v6.25.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Stabilize future.unstable_skipActionErrorRevalidation as future.v7_skipActionErrorRevalidation (#​11769)

    • When this flag is enabled, actions will not automatically trigger a revalidation if they return/throw a Response with a 4xx/5xx status code
    • You may still opt-into revalidation via shouldRevalidate
    • This also changes shouldRevalidate's unstable_actionStatus parameter to actionStatus
Patch Changes
  • Fix regression and properly decode paths inside useMatch so matches/params reflect decoded params (#​11789)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.24.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • When using future.v7_relativeSplatPath, properly resolve relative paths in splat routes that are children of pathless routes (#​11633)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.24.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes

v6.23.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.23.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new unstable_dataStrategy configuration option (#​11098)
    • This option allows Data Router applications to take control over the approach for executing route loaders and actions
    • The default implementation is today's behavior, to fetch all loaders in parallel, but this option allows users to implement more advanced data flows including Remix single-fetch, middleware/context APIs, automatic loader caching, and more
Patch Changes

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.1: v6.22.1

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6221

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with route.lazy not working correctly on initial SPA load when v7_partialHydration is specified (#​11121)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
    <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Routes>
    </div>
  );
}

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
function DashboardTeam() {
  // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
  return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;

  // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
  return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
}

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
  path: "/dashboard",
  children: [
    {
      path: "*",
      action: dashboardAction,
      Component() {
        // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
        // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
        // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
        return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
      },
    },
  ],
});

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Router>
    </div>
  );
}

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with resolveTo in splat routes (#​11045)
    • This is a follow up to #​10983 to handle the few other code paths using getPathContributingMatches
    • This removes the UNSAFE_getPathContributingMatches export from @remix-run/router since we no longer need this in the react-router/react-router-dom layers
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.19.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add unstable_flushSync option to useNavigate/useSumbit/fetcher.load/fetcher.submit to opt-out of React.startTransition and into ReactDOM.flushSync for state updates (#​11005)
  • Remove the unstable_ prefix from the useBlocker hook as it's been in use for enough time that we are confident in the API. We do not plan to remove the prefix from unstable_usePrompt due to differences in how browsers handle window.confirm that prevent React Router from guaranteeing consistent/correct behavior. (#​10991)
Patch Changes

  • Fix useActionData so it returns proper contextual action data and not any action data in the tree (#​11023)

  • Fix bug in useResolvedPath that would cause useResolvedPath(".") in a splat route to lose the splat portion of the URL path. (#​10983)

    • ⚠️ This fixes a quite long-standing bug specifically for "." paths inside a splat route which incorrectly dropped the splat portion of the URL. If you are relative routing via "." inside a splat route in your application you should double check that your logic is not relying on this buggy behavior and update accordingly.

  • Updated dependencies:

v6.18.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix the future prop on BrowserRouter, HashRouter and MemoryRouter so that it accepts a Partial<FutureConfig> instead of requiring all flags to be included. (#​10962)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.17.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix RouterProvider future prop type to be a Partial<FutureConfig> so that not all flags must be specified (#​10900)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.16.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • In order to move towards stricter TypeScript support in the future, we're aiming to replace current usages of any with unknown on exposed typings for user-provided data. To do this in Remix v2 without introducing breaking changes in React Router v6, we have added generics to a number of shared types. These continue to default to any in React Router and are overridden with unknown in Remix. In React Router v7 we plan to move these to unknown as a breaking change. (#​10843)
    • Location now accepts a generic for the location.state value
    • ActionFunctionArgs/ActionFunction/LoaderFunctionArgs/LoaderFunction now accept a generic for the context parameter (only used in SSR usages via createStaticHandler)
    • The return type of useMatches (now exported as UIMatch) accepts generics for match.data and match.handle - both of which were already set to unknown
  • Move the @private class export ErrorResponse to an UNSAFE_ErrorResponseImpl export since it is an implementation detail and there should be no construction of ErrorResponse instances in userland. This frees us up to export a type ErrorResponse which correlates to an instance of the class via InstanceType. Userland code should only ever be using ErrorResponse as a type and should be type-narrowing via isRouteErrorResponse. (#​10811)
  • Export ShouldRevalidateFunctionArgs interface (#​10797)
  • Removed private/internal APIs only required for the Remix v1 backwards compatibility layer and no longer needed in Remix v2 (_isFetchActionRedirect, _hasFetcherDoneAnything) (#​10715)
Patch Changes
remix-run/react-router (react-router-dom)

v6.28.1

Compare Source

v6.28.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
    • Log deprecation warnings for v7 flags (#​11750)
    • Add deprecation warnings to json/defer in favor of returning raw objects
      • These methods will be removed in React Router v7
Patch Changes

v6.27.0

Compare Source

v6.26.2

Compare Source

v6.26.1

Compare Source

v6.26.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new replace(url, init?) alternative to redirect(url, init?) that performs a history.replaceState instead of a history.pushState on client-side navigation redirects (#​11811)
Patch Changes
  • Fix initial hydration behavior when using future.v7_partialHydration along with unstable_patchRoutesOnMiss (#​11838)
    • During initial hydration, router.state.matches will now include any partial matches so that we can render ancestor HydrateFallback components
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.25.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.25.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Stabilize future.unstable_skipActionErrorRevalidation as future.v7_skipActionErrorRevalidation (#​11769)

    • When this flag is enabled, actions will not automatically trigger a revalidation if they return/throw a Response with a 4xx/5xx status code
    • You may still opt-into revalidation via shouldRevalidate
    • This also changes shouldRevalidate's unstable_actionStatus parameter to actionStatus
Patch Changes

v6.24.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.24.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes
  • Fix fetcher.submit types - remove incorrect navigate/fetcherKey/unstable_viewTransition options because they are only relevant for useSubmit (#​11631)
  • Allow falsy location.state values passed to <StaticRouter> (#​11495)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.23.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.23.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new unstable_dataStrategy configuration option (#​11098)
    • This option allows Data Router applications to take control over the approach for executing route loaders and actions
    • The default implementation is today's behavior, to fetch all loaders in parallel, but this option allows users to implement more advanced data flows including Remix single-fetch, middleware/context APIs, automatic loader caching, and more
Patch Changes

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.1

Compare Source

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Include a window__reactRouterVersion tag for CWV Report detection (#​11222)
Patch Changes

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix NavLink isPending when a basename is used (#​11195)
  • Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
    <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Routes>
    </div>
  );
}

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
function DashboardTeam() {
  // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
  return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;

  // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
  return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
}

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
  path: "/dashboard",
  children: [
    {
      path: "*",
      action: dashboardAction,
      Component() {
        // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
        // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
        // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
        return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
      },
    },
  ],
});

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Router>
    </div>
  );
}

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes

v6.19.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add unstable_flushSync option to useNavigate/useSumbit/fetcher.load/fetcher.submit to opt-out of React.startTransition and into ReactDOM.flushSync for state updates (#​11005)
  • Allow unstable_usePrompt to accept a BlockerFunction in addition to a boolean (#​10991)
Patch Changes
  • Fix issue where a changing fetcher key in a useFetcher that remains mounted wasn't getting picked up (#​11009)
  • Fix useFormAction which was incorrectly inheriting the ?index query param from child route action submissions (#​11025)
  • Fix NavLink active logic when to location has a trailing slash (#​10734)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.18.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add support for manual fetcher key specification via useFetcher({ key: string }) so you can access the same fetcher instance from different components in your application without prop-drilling (RFC) (#​10960)

    • Fetcher keys are now also exposed on the fetchers returned from useFetchers so that they can be looked up by key

  • Add navigate/fetcherKey params/props to useSumbit/Form to support kicking off a fetcher submission under the hood with an optionally user-specified key (#​10960)

    • Invoking a fetcher in this way is ephemeral and stateless
    • If you need to access the state of one of these fetchers, you will need to leverage useFetcher({ key }) to look it up elsewhere
Patch Changes
  • Adds a fetcher context to RouterProvider that holds completed fetcher data, in preparation for the upcoming future flag that will change the fetcher persistence/cleanup behavior (#​10961)
  • Fix the future prop on BrowserRouter, HashRouter and MemoryRouter so that it accepts a Partial<FutureConfig> instead of requiring all flags to be included. (#​10962)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.17.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add experimental support for the View Transitions API via document.startViewTransition to enable CSS animated transitions on SPA navigations in your application. (#​10916)

    The simplest approach to enabling a View Transition in your React Router app is via the new <Link unstable_viewTransition> prop. This will cause the navigation DOM update to be wrapped in document.startViewTransition which will enable transitions for the DOM update. Without any additional CSS styles, you'll get a basic cross-fade animation for your page.

    If you need to apply more fine-grained styles for your animations, you can leverage the unstable_useViewTransitionState hook which will tell you when a transition is in progress and you can use that to apply classes or styles:

    function ImageLink(to, src, alt) {
  let isTransitioning = unstable_useViewTransitionState(to);
  return (
    <Link to={to} unstable_viewTransition>
      <img
        src={src}
        alt={alt}
        style={{
          viewTransitionName: isTransitioning ? "image-expand" : "",
        }}
      />
    </Link>
  );
}

    You can also use the <NavLink unstable_viewTransition> shorthand which will manage the hook usage for you and automatically add a transitioning class to the <a> during the transition:

    a.transitioning img {
  view-transition-name: "image-expand";
}
    <NavLink to={to} unstable_viewTransition>
  <img src={src} alt={alt} />
</NavLink>

    For an example usage of View Transitions with React Router, check out our fork of the Astro Records demo.

    For more information on using the View Transitions API, please refer to the Smooth and simple transitions with the View Transitions API guide from the Google Chrome team.

    Please note, that because the ViewTransition API is a DOM API, we now export a specific RouterProvider from react-router-dom with this functionality. If you are importing RouterProvider from react-router, then it will not support view transitions. (#​10928

Patch Changes

v6.16.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes
  • Properly encode rendered URIs in server rendering to avoid hydration errors (#​10769)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.35%. Comparing base (d880aac) to head (4d1080c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 4d1080c differs from pull request most recent head 91ca79f

Please upload reports for the commit 91ca79f to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #935      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.83%   88.35%   -0.49%     
==========================================
  Files         307      291      -16     
  Lines        5268     4938     -330     
  Branches     1338     1243      -95     
==========================================
- Hits         4680     4363     -317     
+ Misses        572      561      -11     
+ Partials       16       14       -2

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 2c34ade to 446f390 Compare April 24, 2022 21:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 446f390 to 13c7e03 Compare May 6, 2022 11:07
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 13c7e03 to a746056 Compare May 17, 2022 03:15
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v5.3.1 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v5.3.2 May 17, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 11945a3 to ba3e57f Compare May 18, 2022 23:11
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v5.3.2 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v5.3.3 May 18, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from ba3e57f to d22c14c Compare June 3, 2022 20:39
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from afb5b5c to 49b6f7a Compare June 13, 2022 13:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 49b6f7a to 07f2f65 Compare June 20, 2022 03:15
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 0846afd to eb53d17 Compare July 26, 2022 05:47
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from eb53d17 to 0770af1 Compare August 7, 2022 22:13
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from db5e04e to f62948e Compare September 13, 2022 06:07
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from f62948e to 150bf53 Compare September 14, 2022 14:08
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 5078ba9 to b8991a3 Compare October 2, 2022 21:19
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v5.3.3 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v5.3.4 Oct 2, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from ffb3190 to a32ec08 Compare October 19, 2022 11:45
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 4 times, most recently from ad51516 to 339f65d Compare October 31, 2022 15:55
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 339f65d to ca39030 Compare November 3, 2022 13:47
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 12 times, most recently from bf47291 to bd197a0 Compare November 27, 2024 01:54
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 6 times, most recently from 9c21019 to 09b3690 Compare December 4, 2024 19:13
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 5 times, most recently from 64b7562 to 87bd73c Compare December 16, 2024 15:11
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 4 times, most recently from bb44dd1 to a17d904 Compare December 20, 2024 16:10
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from a17d904 to 82e6c31 Compare December 20, 2024 21:29
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.1 Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants