Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/conda based travis ci #294

Closed
wants to merge 145 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

boltbeard
Copy link
Contributor

@boltbeard boltbeard commented May 15, 2019

The essential idea of this feature was to allow the use of conda within travis' CI. The .travis.yml file has been change appropirately but somehow during the installation of conda and the solving of the environment, it install Python 2.7 and not the expected Python version.

The current state of this is that: it is unknown why Python 2.7 is defaulted to eventhough there is an explicity python verision given at the beginning.

Hypothesis: There is a chance that if the version of python is not mentioned in the conda yml file which it uses to creat the environment, "conda doesn't take it seriously enough!" and defaults to using Python 2.7

birgits and others added 30 commits October 22, 2018 15:48
Test for build_grid (unfinished)
Test reinforce grid removed.
Reinforce grid removed.
Reinforce grid removed.
@gplssm
Copy link
Contributor

gplssm commented Aug 1, 2019

Now, Travis CI uses conda for installing ding0 dependencies and running the tests.

Furthermore, the branch fix/test_grids is shipped by this PR introducing more tests.

Since ding0 is equipped with 56 tests, this PR also closes #86.

Before the merge can be done, following tasks remain

  • review newly introduced tests from fix/test_grids
  • Eventually update "What's new"
  • Check if docs build
  • Check if docs need an Update

@nesnoj
Copy link
Member

nesnoj commented May 10, 2021

I think this one is outdated, it might be helpful if we switch to github actions #338 but I'm not sure if it's worth to re-integrate after 2 years.. What do you think @gplssm?

@nesnoj nesnoj closed this May 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants