-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8345047: RISC-V: Remove explicit use of AvoidUnalignedAccesses in interpreter #22387
Conversation
👋 Welcome back fyang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@RealFYang This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 24 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@RealFYang The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
/label remove hotspot-compiler |
@RealFYang |
/label add hotspot |
@RealFYang |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for improving the code.
Just some minor comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Thanks!
Since the changes are in the interpreter, I can accept minor regressions introduced in exchange for code readability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
@Hamlin-Li @feilongjiang : Thanks. |
Going to push as commit 82137db.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RealFYang Pushed as commit 82137db. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi, please consider this small interpreter cleanup change.
The use of
AvoidUnalignedAccesses
option for these cases doen't much sense to me.MacroAssembler routines like
revb_h_h_u
andrevb_h_h
will emit 5 instructions when Zbb extension is not available. This is more than the case whenAvoidUnalignedAccesses
option is true. After this change, we always emit 4 instructions compared to 3 instructions in the case when we have Zbb extension. But I don't think it will make a difference.Testing on linux-riscv64 platform:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22387/head:pull/22387
$ git checkout pull/22387
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22387
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22387/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22387
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22387
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22387.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment