Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pt 1 of restructuring ceph RGW #412

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

klgill
Copy link
Contributor

@klgill klgill commented Apr 17, 2024

@fmount I included some comments and questions in the files the same way as in the other PR (//kgilliga:)

Peer reviewers (writers): Please make sure that you use the Adoption Beta Peer Review Checklist (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hxKJdhGNqSOTg6WrbYjJaQIWDu7x5cl2QRYJ7G0HFt8/edit).

@klgill klgill force-pushed the BetaDocs-MigratingCephRGW branch from 692b3a2 to 0c25066 Compare April 18, 2024 15:14
@klgill klgill marked this pull request as ready for review April 18, 2024 15:19
@klgill klgill requested review from fmount, jistr and fao89 April 18, 2024 15:19
@@ -74,6 +76,8 @@ ifeval::["{build}" == "downstream"]
:OpenShift: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
:OpenShiftShort: RHOCP
:OpenStackPreviousInstaller: director
:Ceph: Red Hat Ceph Storage
:CephCluster: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are Ceph and CephCluster referencing the same content? (wondering if we can use the same variable then)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are downstream, but we can't call a cluster a "Red Hat Ceph Storage" cluster upstream. I'm not sure if a cluster should be called "Ceph Storage" upstream, or just "Ceph."

docs_user/assemblies/assembly_migrating-ceph-rgw.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs_user/modules/con_ceph-daemon-cardinality.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs_user/modules/proc_migrating-the-rgw-backends.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs_user/modules/proc_migrating-the-rgw-backends.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs_user/modules/proc_migrating-the-rgw-backends.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@klgill klgill force-pushed the BetaDocs-MigratingCephRGW branch from 0c25066 to e2c368f Compare April 19, 2024 17:25
@klgill klgill merged commit c1ed442 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Apr 19, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants