Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cinder: Downstream only describe single backend #446

Conversation

Akrog
Copy link
Contributor

@Akrog Akrog commented May 8, 2024

When adopting the Cinder volume service in an openstack-operator deployment we can include all backends in a single pod or having a pod for each backend.

This is a system administrator preference and both options will work, but we consider that the 1 backend per pod option is considerably superior, so for the downstream documentation we want it to be the only option.

This patch makes a couple of small conditional changes so that the quick and dirty solution of creating the cinder configuration is not mentioned downstream.

When adopting the Cinder volume service in an openstack-operator
deployment we can include all backends in a single pod or having a pod
for each backend.

This is a system administrator preference and both options will work,
but we consider that the 1 backend per pod option is considerably
superior, so for the downstream documentation we want it to be the only
option.

This patch makes a couple of small conditional changes so that the quick
and dirty solution of creating the cinder configuration is not mentioned
downstream.
@jistr jistr requested a review from klgill May 9, 2024 07:38
Copy link
Contributor

@jistr jistr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but will let @klgill review & merge

@klgill klgill merged commit ee22ed0 into openstack-k8s-operators:main May 9, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants