Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(material): add material package #537

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: refactor/develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chilingling
Copy link
Member

@chilingling chilingling commented Jun 4, 2024

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new material source in the engine configuration, enhancing the flexibility of material usage.
    • Added support for dynamic imports of materials, improving resource management.
  • Chores

    • Updated package.json to include the new dependency @opentiny/tiny-engine-materials.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the material property in the engine.config.js file to reference a dynamically imported module from the @opentiny/tiny-engine-materials package instead of a static JSON file. Additionally, the package.json file has been modified to include this new dependency, expanding the project's resource capabilities.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summaries
designer-demo/engine.config.js Updated material property from ['/mock/bundle.json'] to [material], changing the source to a dynamically imported module.
designer-demo/package.json Added dependency "@opentiny/tiny-engine-materials": "workspace:*" to include the new materials package.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: update splitMaterial and buildMaterials path #1094: The changes in the main PR, which involve updating the material property in the configuration to use a dynamically imported module, are related to the retrieved PR's updates on paths for material assets, as both pertain to the handling and sourcing of material data in the project.

Suggested reviewers

  • hexqi
  • rhlin

Poem

In a world of code, we hop and play,
Materials fresh, in a new array.
From static files to modules bright,
TinyEngine shines, a coder's delight!
With each new change, our dreams take flight,
A rabbit's joy in the coding night! 🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec2c752 and f43f9dd.

Files selected for processing (8)
  • packages/materials/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/materials/buildMaterials.mjs (1 hunks)
  • packages/materials/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/materials/src/ElementPlus/ElButton.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/materials/src/ElementPlus/ElInput.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/materials/src/TinyVue/TinyButton.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/materials/src/TinyVue/TinyInput.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/materials/src/html/Input.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • packages/materials/package.json
  • packages/materials/src/ElementPlus/ElButton.json
  • packages/materials/src/TinyVue/TinyButton.json
  • packages/materials/src/TinyVue/TinyInput.json
  • packages/materials/src/html/Input.json
Additional context used
Markdownlint
packages/materials/README.md

12-12: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


33-33: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used

Additional comments not posted (4)
packages/materials/buildMaterials.mjs (3)

24-42: Ensure all required fields are checked in validateComponent.

This function correctly checks for missing required fields and logs appropriate errors. Good use of array operations for validation.


118-154: Ensure error handling in buildComponents is robust.

Good use of try-catch for error handling. Consider adding more specific error messages or handling different types of exceptions if applicable.


156-190: Review the implementation of the serve function.

The function sets up a watcher and a static server correctly. Good use of asynchronous programming and logging.

packages/materials/src/ElementPlus/ElInput.json (1)

1-292: Review the schema definition for ElInput.

The JSON schema is well-structured and includes comprehensive details about the component, its properties, events, and slots. Good use of nested structures and data types.

packages/materials/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/materials/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/materials/buildMaterials.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +202 to +258

function start() {
const commandsMap = {
serve: serve,
build: build,
'build:split': buildSplit
}

const command = process.argv.slice(2)

if (!commandsMap[command]) {
logger.error(`[@opentiny/tiny-engine-materials] 不支持${command}命令`)

return
}

commandsMap[command]()
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The start function in packages/materials/buildMaterials.mjs does include a basic validation check to ensure the command is in the commandsMap. However, it only checks if the command exists in the map and does not handle other potential issues such as invalid command formats or additional arguments.

  • Location in codebase:
    • packages/materials/buildMaterials.mjs (lines 202-219)

To improve the validation, consider adding more comprehensive checks, such as verifying the format of the command and handling unexpected additional arguments.

Analysis chain

Validate command input in start function.

Ensure that the command validation is comprehensive and covers all expected scenarios.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify command validation in the start function.

# Test: Search for command validation logic. Expect: Comprehensive validation logic.
rg --type javascript $'commandsMap[command]'

Length of output: 80



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify command validation in the start function.

# Test: Search for command validation logic. Expect: Comprehensive validation logic.
rg --type js $'commandsMap[command]'

Length of output: 37



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the start function and review its implementation.

# Search for the start function definition in JavaScript files.
rg --type js 'function start'

Length of output: 31



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the start function and review its implementation.

# Search for the start function definition in JavaScript and ES module files.
rg --type-add 'mjs:*.mjs' --type js --type mjs 'function start'

Length of output: 122



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract and display the start function implementation from buildMaterials.mjs.

# Extract the start function implementation.
rg --type-add 'mjs:*.mjs' --type mjs --context 10 'function start' packages/materials/buildMaterials.mjs

Length of output: 495

yy-wow
yy-wow previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2024
rhlin
rhlin previously approved these changes Oct 25, 2024
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1",
"serve": "node buildMaterials.mjs serve",
"build": "node buildMaterials.mjs build",
"build:split": "node buildMaterials.mjs build:split"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

外层也有两个物料的命令,看下是不是一起整合下

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

全体迁移完成后再整合

@chilingling chilingling dismissed stale reviews from rhlin and yy-wow via ac2bdc2 October 26, 2024 03:43
@github-actions github-actions bot added the refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature label Feb 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
designer-demo/package.json (1)

13-13: Use consistent version specifier for workspace dependencies.

The new dependency uses workspace:* while @opentiny/tiny-engine uses workspace:^. Consider using consistent version specifiers across workspace dependencies.

-    "@opentiny/tiny-engine-materials": "workspace:*",
+    "@opentiny/tiny-engine-materials": "workspace:^",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f43f9dd and 7c7bc09.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • designer-demo/engine.config.js (1 hunks)
  • designer-demo/package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: push-check
🔇 Additional comments (3)
designer-demo/engine.config.js (2)

1-10: Document the breaking changes and provide a migration guide.

This change introduces a breaking change by modifying how materials are configured. Please:

  1. Document the new material module structure
  2. Provide a migration guide for users moving from the JSON file format
  3. Update the README with the new configuration details

1-1: Verify the material module's structure and add error handling.

The change from a static JSON file to a dynamic module is a breaking change. Consider:

  1. Adding error handling for module loading failures
  2. Documenting the expected shape of the material module
  3. Providing type information

Also applies to: 6-6

designer-demo/package.json (1)

1-34: Add tests for the material package.

The PR checklist indicates that tests are missing. Please add tests to verify:

  1. Material module loading
  2. Integration with the engine configuration
  3. Error handling for invalid material configurations

Would you like me to help generate test cases for the material package?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants