Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix e2e test grid by using ginkgo labels #3451

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Collaborator

@perdasilva perdasilva commented Nov 26, 2024

Description of the change:
clone of #3445 which seems to have stalled

Motivation for the change:

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

Per Goncalves da Silva added 3 commits November 20, 2024 14:06
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
@perdasilva perdasilva enabled auto-merge November 26, 2024 09:44
@perdasilva perdasilva disabled auto-merge November 26, 2024 09:44
@perdasilva perdasilva merged commit 77ce6ff into operator-framework:master Nov 26, 2024
12 checks passed
@perdasilva perdasilva deleted the label-e2e-tests branch November 26, 2024 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant