Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support multiline values in backticks #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2023
Merged

support multiline values in backticks #16

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

vanodevium
Copy link
Contributor

#12

Pay attention: I don't know expectation. But backticks values are parseable now

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (782c9bb) 88.23% compared to head (c4d7b3a) 88.33%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #16      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     88.23%   88.33%   +0.09%     
  Complexity       24       24              
============================================
  Files             1        1              
  Lines           119      120       +1     
============================================
+ Hits            105      106       +1     
  Misses           14       14              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 88.33% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ovidyou
Copy link
Member

ovidyou commented Dec 5, 2023

Thank you @vanodevium ! I appreciate all your help!

@ovidyou ovidyou merged commit a61c1b4 into ovidigital:master Dec 5, 2023
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants