Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): lock file maintenance npm packages #90

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 16, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed
pnpm (source) packageManager minor 10.2.1 -> 10.4.0 age adoption passing confidence

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Release Notes

pnpm/pnpm (pnpm)

v10.4.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • pnpm approve-builds --global works now for allowing dependencies of globally installed packages to run postinstall scripts.

  • The pnpm add command now supports a new flag, --allow-build, which allows building the specified dependencies. For instance, if you want to install a package called bundle that has esbuild as a dependency and want to allow esbuild to run postinstall scripts, you can run:

    pnpm --allow-build=esbuild add bundle
    

    This will run esbuild's postinstall script and also add it to the pnpm.onlyBuiltDependencies field of package.json. So, esbuild will always be allowed to run its scripts in the future.

    Related PR: #​9086.

  • The pnpm init command adds a packageManager field with the current version of pnpm CLI #​9069. To disable this behaviour, set the init-package-manager setting to false.

Patch Changes
  • pnpm approve-builds should work after two consecutive pnpm install runs #​9083.
  • Fix instruction for updating pnpm with corepack #​9101.
  • The pnpm version specified by packageManager cannot start with v.

v10.3.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Added a new setting called strict-dep-builds. When enabled, the installation will exit with a non-zero exit code if any dependencies have unreviewed build scripts (aka postinstall scripts) #​9071.
Patch Changes
  • Fix a false negative of verify-deps-before-run after pnpm install --production|--no-optional #​9019.
  • Print the warning about blocked installation scripts at the end of the installation output and make it more prominent.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - "on monday" in timezone Asia/Shanghai.

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Feb 16, 2025

Branch automerge failure

This PR was configured for branch automerge. However, this is not possible, so it has been raised as a PR instead.


  • Branch has one or more failed status checks

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) February 16, 2025 17:56
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 16, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #90 will improve performances by 9.65%

Comparing renovate/npm-packages (32a11eb) with main (b9ce324)

Summary

⚡ 2 improvements
✅ 4 untouched benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
resolve '> 0.5%' 38.6 µs 35.7 µs +7.96%
resolve 'node >= 8' 227.1 µs 207.1 µs +9.65%

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Feb 16, 2025

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants