Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a ManagerOptions type to allow for customizable options #102
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add a ManagerOptions type to allow for customizable options #102
Changes from 1 commit
c0e3dfb
caa0a40
57af634
891b986
6d7fc60
80a21fe
9c393db
bb8361f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess you might as well have two options rather than forcing the
*2
to be more flexible? You'd probably need to check thatmax > min
though.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, i'll make that change. More flexibility is always good.
@Tibo-lg What is the intention of having a minRefundDelay and a max? What does it do to have those bounds, rather than just 1 value and making the refund after that time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I created a type called RefundDelayWindow. Tell me what you think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ditto
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I set about trying to make this change in the same way I did for refund_delay, but it became a huge rats nest. I created a struct called
CETnSequenceWindow
, but I couldn't import it from dlc-manager in dlc-messages because of a circular dependency. Then I tried just using a cet_nsequence_min and cet_nsequence_max, and handing those all the way down, but that also became really messy because that sometimes it expects just the "min" value, and it gets really confusing.What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I understand why you need to use that in dlc-messages?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I think I was trying to pass the struct with the min/max values too far down , when I could have just been passing the u32.
Anyway, do you think it would be good to have a CETnSequenceWindow object with a min / max values, or just leave it as a u32 with default 288?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As mentioned above I feel like not having a separate object is simpler as in I think the max value is only required in few places.