beauty

While beauty is in the eye of the beholder, we believe in a thing such as universal beauty.

            ctx.line_to(offset_x, offset_y);
            ctx.stroke();
            ctx.begin_path();
            ctx.move_to(offset_x, offset_y);

can be beautified in Angle as

with context do 
  line to offset.x offset.y
  stroke
  begin path
  move to offset.x offset.y
end

Can anyone really enjoy all those dots and braces and semicolons .();? How could anyone argue that the first code is more beautiful than the second code?

• In the first example it is immediately clear that the receiving object is ctx/context

multi-value